[火Ken]

小弟想參考一下，費事做左d sale 既豬肉，如果我短時間或未有咁快上FF，小弟想買支室內人像鏡，有咩提意？L鏡如何？？小弟已有Tamron A16，Canon 10-22mm，70-200mm 小小白，同Sigma 30mm 1.4，請ching賜教，thanks~

[tcfreeman]

50f1.8 or 1.4, (=80), 85f1.8 (=136) just a bit long, depanding on how large the space
if yr budget not tight go for 1.4
hope can help

[zeater]

C-hing, 你套工具都夠玩室內人像...
加支外閃ok.

[Canon Ball]

I agree, don't waste money on Len. Perhaps, just buy a flash instead.

[gary0720]

24-105 L
50 1.4

[火Ken]

外閃光燈有支EX430II，有意放棄支A16而買支17-40mm f/4L，經濟d，其實FF既質素有很大分別嗎？我d 同事大部分都係Nikon友，小數人玩Canon，全部都係350，400D上FF，得我一個用40D，佢地講到FF幾好幾好，但我講得我都要符合經濟，同自己技術，40D已經係好好用，但自己又覺得FF帶鏡方便d，其餘就沒有point 推動我轉機，5DII係好吸引，但兩三年後又同一命運，我反而有意思買部5D算.......40D同d鏡照留用lor，Ching咁ok ma？

[calwkf]

50 1.8
24-105 4L

[tcfreeman]

ff is better than cf? for me, yes, because the main point n reason is light transit though the glasses to the sensor, like film format, bigger is better,
so why i upgraded to 5d, not the pxs, is ff sensor,
why some of nikon fans had jumped ship to canon, that was big 2nd mistake made by nikon, lated to produced ff body, untill D3.

[火Ken]

thanks tcfreeman ching，但如果我真的不轉FF，我買支16-35mm L鏡好，還是17-40mm L鏡？

[tcfreeman]

boths are high quality lens, when use for a cf bdy, = 27.2-64 or 25.6-56
if u have a lot of dim light works, such as indoor, 2.8 that is better,
if u mainly for o/door such as landscapes, urban, boths, but f4 is cheaper
for walkaround len, i suggest f4, cos so close to 28-70 (ff) n save 50% money to buy something, such as len, bag, flash etc.
this len you can found in the bag of most pros (l'scapes or travel)
i still use this len mainly on the 10d
hope can help

[LEDIV]

50 1.4 and 17-40

[火Ken]

thanks tcfreeman ching ~

[tcfreeman]

do not call me ching please, we are all photo-mates, same level, same hobby
i'm still a learner

[calwkf]

其實各 c-hing 有d咩鏡都唔重要, 最重是你需要d咩鏡.

[gary0720]

xdevil 兄講得好岩, 需要影咩野先買岩駛既鏡/配件!