上個主題 :: 下個主題 |
作者 |
訊息 |
力力
註冊: 2008-11-07
上載我的肖像
|
真係唔好成日都貴機就影到靚相真得咖 Post time: 12 月 29 日 |
|
|
小弟都係一名新手,成日睇到d人話咩L鏡咩咩咩咁
又話咩機好咩機唔好,咩機D野唔好用
我覺得只要你有料400D同450D Kit ,1000DKit都已經影得好靚
香港人咩都用錢去衡量D野好唔好,
應該睇多D出面D野,香港好細咖咋,出面都有好多有料既人
香港都有好多,有好多都影得好好,又D真係得個機貴=.=''''''
個人意見,不喜勿插
|
|
|
|
 |
Canon Ball
註冊: 2008-07-19
上載我的肖像
|
Re: 真係唔好成日都貴機就影到靚相真得咖 Post time: 12 月 29 日 |
|
|
You really have a good point. Remember everybody have a very different set of mind and artistic side. Everybody will create good photos, regardless on different camera and setting. I agree that price and money not always comes first, but this is how some people think. If you put yourself in their position, then it will makes yourself more uncomfortable. Just relax and take good photos. As you said, the world is big and open your mind!!!
|
|
|
|
 |
zeater
註冊: 2008-01-08
上載我的肖像
|
Re: 真係唔好成日都貴機就影到靚相真得咖 Post time: 12 月 29 日 |
|
|
Equipment is just a part (but not necessary an essential part) of making good photos, and it nevertheless is a tool that aid making photos/ good photos. An essential parts can be exposure control, use of light, timing of opening the shutter, composition, color combination...etc, which should also be handled by photographers.
|
|
|
|
 |
Evian
註冊: 2005-11-30
上載我的肖像
|
Re: 真係唔好成日都貴機就影到靚相真得咖 Post time: 12 月 29 日 |
|
|
我睇 photo.net 好多 pro 都係用 450D.
貴有貴影, 平有平影, 唔駛埋人, 最緊要自己影得開心
|
|
|
|
 |
gary_che
註冊: 2006-04-26
上載我的肖像
|
Re: 真係唔好成日都貴機就影到靚相真得咖 Post time: 12 月 29 日 |
|
|
回覆:力力
講得好,十卜十卜
|
|
|
|
 |
Ison
註冊: 2008-04-12
上載我的肖像
|
Re: 真係唔好成日都貴機就影到靚相真得咖 Post time: 12 月 30 日 |
|
|
唔會架, DC 仔都可以影得好靚. 睇自已有無心去影. 但響Canon 區當然講 Canon d 好野啦^_^
|
|
|
|
 |
speedlight
註冊: 2008-05-16
上載我的肖像
|
Re: 真係唔好成日都貴機就影到靚相真得咖 Post time: 12 月 30 日 |
|
|
小弟都係一名新手,成日睇到d人話咩L鏡咩咩咩咁
又話咩機好咩機唔好,咩機D野唔好用
我覺得只要你有料400D同450D Kit ,1000DKit都已經影得好靚
香港人咩都用錢去衡量D野好唔好,
應該睇多D出面D野,香港好細咖咋,出面都有好多有料既人
香港都有好多,有好多都影得好好,又D真係得個機貴=.=''''''
個人意見,不喜勿插
---------------------------------------------------------------
影靚相,絕對平機都可以,但可能功能和環境受較大限制.即是不論你用乜機都可以影到影像.
如果講到靚畫質,就貴機一定勝過平機,1仔影出泥D畫質5D呀,50D呀個類中級機點可以雙提並論,尤其450D入門機如果效果差不多邊個會買貴個部?錢多?
好相片絕對同器材無關,但要限題材,你總不可能用支kit鏡去南生圍影飛鳥吧?就算影到都不算好相片吧?
要好畫質的話除了功夫好就一定要付出多D錢,貴價機高質鏡缺一不可,但付出與效果絕非正比.
|
|
|
|
 |
iversonhui
註冊: 2008-06-07
上載我的肖像
|
Re: 真係唔好成日都貴機就影到靚相真得咖 Post time: 12 月 30 日 |
|
|
我覺得只要你有料400D同450D Kit ,1000DKit都已經影得好靚~
你講得一點都冇錯呢:p
都係果句,影靚相,有好既構圖,自己的創意,正確的曝光,平機都可以影到靚相!
但如果係聞相既人,要色sharp到好似差不多同原色一樣,detail到每一條毛毛都睇到,咁就真係要一d好既鏡頭 (如: L鏡)
如果你係電腦睇,放大2至3倍去睇,你就知點解d人會中毒了=.=
又話咩機好咩機唔好,咩機D野唔好用~
自己覺得ok咪得囉!各人有各人既意見姐~
如果機同鏡二選一,我一定會鏡頭先決^^
影靚相,有好既構圖,有自己既創意,正確的曝光,平機都可以影到靚相!
加油!!!
|
|
|
|
 |
老叟
註冊: 2003-04-22
上載我的肖像
|
Re: 真係唔好成日都貴機就影到靚相真得咖 Post time: 12 月 30 日 |
|
|
不過機好D,發揮潛能空間創作多D囉
|
|
|
|
 |
yiu_hei
註冊: 2004-08-29
上載我的肖像
|
Re: 真係唔好成日都貴機就影到靚相真得咖 Post time: 12 月 30 日 |
|
|
影出泥係差唔多
但問題係1000D 400D 同450D 等等機身性能同佢D大佬比係有出入
咁就要睇下你用唔用得著
|
|
|
|
 |
cktak
註冊: 2003-09-22
上載我的肖像
|
Re: 真係唔好成日都貴機就影到靚相真得咖 Post time: 12 月 30 日 |
|
|
I am still a amateur but I would like share my exprience.
Recently, I bought a new lense 70-300mm f/4.0-5.6 IS USM with my limited budget. So on first X'mas holidays last week, I went to the seahore to try and do some practice on my new lense. I used my old 300D and the new lense taking photo for the "water bird". There were "池鷺", "夜鷺" and event "白胸翠鳥" and "普通翠鳥". However, my lense does not have the focal length long enough to take good picture for those water birds, especially the "翠鳥". There were many CHing there too. They were taking photo on the "翠鳥" using their "大砲". I envy those CHing and their tools.
After an hours practice, I began to leave. Suddenly there was a "褐頭焦鶯" flied into the brush near me. I immediately moved slowly and took shot on it. I tried to moved as close as posible to it. The nearest distant I could reach is about 2M from it and I was lucky that it didn't fly away. I took many many shots on it and spent almost half an hour to "hunt" it. Fortunately, I could took some nice pictures on it. I really enjoyed that day, especially the last half an hour on the "褐頭焦鶯".
What I want to say is that: "tools" is not most important thing for photography. The most important is how you can make use of your tools to take picture that satisfying you and how you enjoy photography.
|
|
|
|
 |
王迦南
註冊: 2007-06-10
上載我的肖像
|
Re: 真係唔好成日都貴機就影到靚相真得咖 Post time: 12 月 30 日 |
|
|
故事話說滕原拓海駕駛一部雙門Corolla跑贏好多辣車。
問題係世界上有幾多個滕原拓海?
你自己係唔係滕原拓海?
|
|
|
|
 |
thewthew
註冊: 2008-10-14
上載我的肖像
|
Re: 真係唔好成日都貴機就影到靚相真得咖 Post time: 12 月 30 日 |
|
|
平機KIT鏡可以影到靚相 - 同意
同一個人用靚D既鏡更靚 - 個人認為
錢係1個限制,,5係量度機制,,,
但鏡頭1樣有限制,,F2.8同F5.6出梨真係有分別架嘛,,,
科技日新月異,,你既技術跟得上嗎?
QUOTE: <The most important is how you can make use of your tools to take picture that satisfying you and how you enjoy photography.>
|
|
|
|
 |
iso_ray
註冊: 2007-10-01
上載我的肖像
|
Re: 真係唔好成日都貴機就影到靚相真得咖 Post time: 12 月 30 日 |
|
|
能力愈大, 包含愈大
無錯, 你身手好kit鏡都係神鏡, 但係你總唔能夠將支kit鏡扭去f1.2大光圈拍室內小孩, 又或者將支kit鏡扭去400mmf2.8打烏蠅, 之後再將部1000D較去51點對焦+每秒10張連拍+6400ISO去影室內運動
或者你真係唔知鏡頭有解像度既分別
你咁講, 其實用手機拍都得, 根本唔需要買DC, SLR, 我勸你都係唔好浪費, 用手機影已經OK ^^
|
|
|
|
 |
ducktak
註冊: 2003-02-27
上載我的肖像
|
Re: 真係唔好成日都貴機就影到靚相真得咖 Post time: 12 月 30 日 |
|
|
我認同iversonhui講法, 我都係用緊400d, 一用高iso(400或以上)影就好唔掂, 解決辦法有幾個, 而最呃到自己係只張啲相放facebook, 咁細resolution 一啲都唔覺~笑
特別係室內影小朋友, 就算用支85mm f1.8影都唔夠光, 但係又唔用得閃燈... 而且大光圈長焦距影得隻眼仔sharp時臉仔又矇... 我寧願細光圈高iso加反光板, 但係小朋友啲表情有就有無就無...... 唔同大人.... 1/25..... 都係太慢...
對我黎講, 貴野係比多左大啲既創作空間, 但並不代表用貴野出黎就係靚相.
|
|
|
|
 |
|