[ericphoto]

有無C hing 比啲意見呀, 難比以决定(FF机), THX

[ericphoto]

有無C hing 比啲意見呀, 難比以决定(FF机), THX

[ACanonGuy]

If budget permits certainly would go with C50L. If between C50 1.4 and S50 1.4 I would go with S50 1.4.

[ericphoto]

Thx C hing.

[Obi-Wan]

三支都有過，現在只KEEP C1.4 同S1.4
最SHARP C1.4
最佳bokeh S1.4 (不過原全冇得同Minolta STF 135比！)
最多我唔鍾意的Nisen bokeh C1.2
最少 “口徑蝕“
最煩 S1.4
最保值 C1.2
最抵用 S1.4
最方便 C1.4
我用得最多 S1.4
只買一支用S
只買一支作投資C1.2
只買一支玩超淺景深C1.2
只買一支係咁意玩下淺景深，3支都咪買，一支cheap 50 1.8已掂！

[Obi-Wan]

最少“口徑蝕“ S1.4

[h0001244]

好欣賞 Obi 兄的簡而明快的sharing

[bzboy]

Obi-Wan Ching,

Perfect answer..... good good good!

[homankop]

C50 1.4

[火Ken]

Obi-wan c hing 最可信！

我支覺C50 1.4 ！

[Marksman01]

no doubt on 50/1.2L, talking about best image quality under no budget limitation.

[Obi-Wan]

火Ken,
C50/1.4 is good, in fact the C50/1.8 is also a 黑馬 (if u don't mind it's pentagonal bokeh)

C50/1.8 vs C50/1.2 @ f2.8
http://www.the-digital-picture.com/Reviews/ISO-12233-Sample-Crops.aspx?Lens=105&Camera=453&Sample=0&FLI=0&API=2&LensComp=403&CameraComp=453&SampleComp=0&FLIComp=0&APIComp=5

C50/1.8 vs C50/1.2 @ f8
http://www.the-digital-picture.com/Reviews/ISO-12233-Sample-Crops.aspx?Lens=105&Camera=453&Sample=0&FLI=0&API=5&LensComp=403&CameraComp=453&SampleComp=0&FLIComp=0&APIComp=8

[Marksman01]

Obi 兄, MTF 可參考, 但用黎比較呢d 講究靚畫質既super fast lens 就真糸完全會誤導的.

http://www.the-digital-picture.com/Reviews/ISO-12233-Sample-Crops.aspx?Lens=106&Camera=453&Sample=0&FLI=0&API=1&LensComp=397&CameraComp=453&SampleComp=0&FLIComp=0&APIComp=3

支85L II 可以立刻停產 ^_^

[talestar]

50.8 解像力一向係一流 更好於部份L鏡

[wow9]

C50.4 - 平靚正