[Issac_Chiu]

24-105mm f/4L IS USM
vs
17-40mm f/4L USM
好迷惘，24-105就貴D，17-40就平D，本人用550d！又想一系五買一買就買靚小小！！影人和景！

[digital1]

我都係用550D又係考慮緊呢兩支鏡，24-105 range好似好d但我估如果買呢支，可能好快又要買支10-22影景。頭痕中.....

而家用緊18-135 kit 鏡同50-1.8

[Issac_Chiu]

digital1 CHING，我都系甘念，24-105and17-40，邊支對焦快，色水又系邊支好D？

[explorer_sky]

兩支我覺得差無幾，只係個range唔同，550D建議17-40，FF就24-105喇。

[Issac_Chiu]

explorer_sky ching，
色水and對焦快慢都差五多？

[digital1]

我都唔肯定，但24-105影景真係應該唔係幾夠。

[Issac_Chiu]

甘又系既~~wide五夠~

[david521]

如果樓主講明 "" 一系五買一買就買靚小小"", 點解唔canon 24-70 2.8呢??

[rankinelo]

digital1 CHing, Issac_Chiu CHing,

小小經驗

我個人都係550D + 24-105L, 17-40L唔係唔好, 但係番佢係冇IS既, 一入閃內/晚上, 快門一般得番1/8至1/15左右(ISO800), 冇閃冇腳架, 好多相都會影唔到

個人最後用左Tokina 116來做wide/ultrawide

希望幫到你地

[thestone11]

Should consider 24-70mm f/2.8 over the 24-105mm f/4. I have the 24-70mm myself, I love it. I initially bought the 24-105mm, but after a day of trying, I returned it and exchange for the 24-70mm, glad I did that.

It is always good to have a faster lens, so the f/2.8 is a advantage. You don't really need IS for such a fast lens, so I don't see the IS on the 24-105mm is a must to have. Picture quality is better on the 24-70mm and the closest focusing distance is better on the 24-70mm as well.

[Minipod]

24-70 f2.8 冇is 和重

我用60D 24-105 + 10-22.

[Issac_Chiu]

david521 ching thestone11 ching，24-70系就系好！sor冇打buget，我buget系7000左右！！念緊用新鏡定2手好~~~

rankinelo ching，如果17-40+閃仲會五還甘？如果我出17-40，就可以出F1.4！

同埋有個新手問題：副廠鏡系五系對焦都慢？

[homankop]

2支都要

[Minipod]

買2手鏡 - 首先要清楚自己能否承擔風險.
小心, 小心

[rankinelo]

Issac CHing,
用閃會好些，但係睇你點用支鏡啦，冇話唔得
因為可以用S30.4 or C35/2, 都係咁用