[killerleolam]

EF 50mm f/1.8 II 用 f/4 時成像是否和其他鏡 (非 L 鏡) 用50 mm f/4 時沒分別?

[GBAmon]

影人淺景F4吳夠.50.8在2.8吳夠淺,50.4在2.2就very good.

[thewthew]

F2.2就岩岩好啦,,

[killerleolam]

多謝回應,但你們都答唔到我個問題....

[undercover+ing]

據我所知 50 1.8 用的不是玻璃鏡片
光學跟影出來的質素一定不及 50 1.4 吧 我想
本人是新手 有錯請抖正
謝~

[yung2]

影人收到f2都夠la, 收到f4又利得滯, 反而要係photoshop磨皮...

50mm f1.4其實唔抵用la, 我依家都係用50mm f1.8果支.

[francischeungkl]

Refer to your question, the depth of field will be the same when compared with the other 50mm at f/4. However. the quaity, softless and colour, etc of background will varied with different brand and model. So why people pay so much to buy expensive lens).

[calwkf]

I using 50 1.8 also and prefer use f/2.2 is better. ^^

[pal@]

當然有分別啦 50mm 1.2 要過萬 500mm 1.4 2千幾
50mm 1.8 6百幾 唔係非glass

但50mm 1.8 夠大光圈好易有淺景深 成像都唔錯 賣6百幾 係非常超值

[Louis @ Gooner]

>>>I using 50 1.8 also and prefer use f/2.2 is better. ^^
xdevil兄, 咁係咪f/2.2成像仲好過f/2.8呢?

[william_lau]

我反而幾鐘意呢隻鏡Ｄ色，雖然飽和度比貴鏡冇咁高，但睇落好自然，好舒服。　佢最大缺點係對焦時太大聲o者。

[RBgear]

Even both at F4:
Resolution is different: 50 F1.4 have high resolution
Distortion is different.