上個主題 :: 下個主題 |
作者 |
訊息 |
kuramalai
註冊: 2008-09-27
上載我的肖像
|
煩緊應不應轉會 Post time: 1 月 10 日 |
|
|
用了450D個幾月, 影出來d相都唔錯,係好似唔夠立體感(質感), 我怕就算upgrade到5D或1D都係唔夠立體同深度!
睇番之前用部Pentax04年ist DS影d人像好似重正d,好立體,好耐看!
因為Canon配件選擇多,機動性強,各方面都幾平均先買!
睇攝影書S5pro D相又好似好正(唔知係部機定係鏡頭的原因)
有無Ching除了Canon機重有用過Pentax機或S5 pro可以俾下意見!
|
|
|
|
 |
oliver_lws
註冊: 2008-03-17
上載我的肖像
|
Re: 煩緊應不應轉會 Post time: 1 月 10 日 |
|
|
S5 pro 影人像真係正
fujifilm 係得geh -w- 但你要留意像素
同埋 fujifilm 好似放棄左dslr 市場gum... d 配件好少
其實機唔係大曬
你試下用D 正D geh lens,
可能你會再愛上450D
|
|
|
|
 |
kuramalai
註冊: 2008-09-27
上載我的肖像
|
Re: 煩緊應不應轉會 Post time: 1 月 10 日 |
|
|
S5 pro影人正, 有無相睇?
|
|
|
|
 |
eyklee
註冊: 2003-07-30
上載我的肖像
|
Re: 煩緊應不應轉會 Post time: 1 月 11 日 |
|
|
fuji only produce the CCD/CMOS, the body is Nikon, so most (not all) nikon accessory / lens can be used. Fuji is famous for its dynamic range but s5 is an old product and fuji is very slow in making new models. I feel the same that they seem not to focus in the DSLR market.
In my opinion:
Fuji is a film company, so their camera focus on producing the most satisfying picture and color;
Nikon is a optical company, so they focus on making sure the accuracy of light passing through their lenses;
Canon is a commercial company, so they focus on mass market.
After all, it's all personal preference. Cheers.
|
|
|
|
 |
老叟
註冊: 2003-04-22
上載我的肖像
|
Re: 煩緊應不應轉會 Post time: 1 月 11 日 |
|
|
總言之, 多人用,唔正都有限啦!!!
|
|
|
|
 |
kuramalai
註冊: 2008-09-27
上載我的肖像
|
Re: 煩緊應不應轉會 Post time: 1 月 11 日 |
|
|
多謝師兄分亨見解,同你睇法大致相同,我覺得Nikon比Canon更商業化,高低級機種功能分得好開,咩都以錢行先!
|
|
|
|
 |
wlachan
註冊: 2004-10-31
上載我的肖像
|
Re: 煩緊應不應轉會 Post time: 1 月 11 日 |
|
|
轉黎轉去一場空
一身技術最受用
各大品牌有高手
影得水皮快去修
|
|
|
|
 |
|