上個主題 :: 下個主題 |
作者 |
訊息 |
billyc
註冊: 2004-07-04
上載我的肖像
|
應否買17-35 2.8L Post time: 10 月 8 日 |
|
|
各位:
我用5DII,老婆用600D,擁有24-105 4L,70-200 4L,50 1.4,老婆主要影阿仔,想買支大光圈影阿仔(唔想用閃燈),我想影風影,想要支廣角鏡,係買支17-35 2.8L可以一次滿足晒兩個願望? 有無其他建議?謝謝。
|
|
|
|
 |
XexeX
註冊: 2007-03-01
上載我的肖像
|
Re: 應否買17-35 2.8L Post time: 10 月 8 日 |
|
|
2.8都唔算大光圈喎,會唔會考慮24L II?
|
|
|
|
 |
Hammingbird
註冊: 2011-01-26
上載我的肖像
|
Re: 應否買17-35 2.8L Post time: 10 月 8 日 |
|
|
16-35 2.8l ??
|
|
|
|
 |
billyc
註冊: 2004-07-04
上載我的肖像
|
Re: 應否買17-35 2.8L Post time: 10 月 8 日 |
|
|
Right. Should be 16 instead
|
|
|
|
 |
moya
註冊: 2010-03-20
上載我的肖像
|
Re: 應否買17-35 2.8L Post time: 10 月 8 日 |
|
|
16-35 F2.8啦
如果唔夠BUDGET可以諗支17-40 F4
|
|
|
|
 |
moya
註冊: 2010-03-20
上載我的肖像
|
Re: 應否買17-35 2.8L Post time: 10 月 8 日 |
|
|
又或者10-22, HAHA, 一定最WIDE
|
|
|
|
 |
Kevin_roamer
註冊: 2011-05-26
上載我的肖像
|
Re: 應否買17-35 2.8L Post time: 10 月 8 日 |
|
|
SIGMA 12-24 両支也可WIDE.
|
|
|
|
 |
火Ken
註冊: 2007-03-25
上載我的肖像
|
Re: 應否買17-35 2.8L Post time: 10 月 9 日 |
|
|
17-35L is good~
|
|
|
|
 |
fish30d
註冊: 2007-07-24
上載我的肖像
|
Re: 應否買17-35 2.8L Post time: 10 月 9 日 |
|
|
Cannot use Canon 10-22 because it is EFS lens, not usable on 5D2.
If I were you I would go for 16-35 instead of Sigma 12-24 for 2 reasons:
1) You don't really need 12-16 range unless you take a lot of building shots, but then the shape of the buildings will be bent.
2) 16-35 has much better 2nd hand value.
I have a Sigma 12-24, used only once in Europe, regret buying it.
|
|
|
|
 |
billyc
註冊: 2004-07-04
上載我的肖像
|
Re: 應否買17-35 2.8L Post time: 10 月 9 日 |
|
|
多謝各位的意見同回覆•
小弟今曰終於抵唔住誘惑,買了canon 16-35 II 2.8 f,
果然係正靚爽, 但係貴,真係早買早享受,大三元果然係突出,今曰買了已狂影了••••正正正
|
|
|
|
 |
ultegra1980
註冊: 2006-03-15
上載我的肖像
|
Re: 應否買17-35 2.8L Post time: 10 月 10 日 |
|
|
fish30D, i want to ask for the reason, why you said "regret to buy Sigma 12-24" please explain, thanks!
|
|
|
|
 |
|