[scuba.diver]

C Hing 對 Tokina AT-X M35 PRO DX AF 35mm f/2.8 Macro 有何高見？Canon EF 35mm f/2.0 樣本相已經看了千百遍!

除非唔0岩用，否則我入了的鏡多數不賣出去，所以都係買新鏡，亦自問唔係追器材一族。

L鏡不是我杯茶，好同意一些 C Hing 所講，買鏡唔送技術，唔送靈感! 所以L鏡同我都無乜緣份；況且我都好鐘意影RAW+後製，所以基本上色水與光暗我想點都得。

據聞要去"發燒"訂先有貨。

我用緊Tokina 116，所以對它有信心。只係對35mm定焦來說是初到貴境的新手。

多謝C Hing指導。

[viovanda]

Canon

[jigglypuff]

Canon X2

[APOII]

Tokina marco

[billshm]

Canon X3

[look_yau]

Canon x4

[叮噹仔]

師兄有無諗過其他??例如:

Canon 28mm f1.8,
金屬一d既外殼, 又快又靜又全時手動暗位又對到焦既USM,

又或者,

Sigma 30mm f1.4,
光圈大好多, 多野玩好多~

[talestar]

35L is the only choice for 35mm

[MCCU]

CANON 35 F2係好鏡 因為中央同周圍解折度好
35 L 中間好D 周圍一般 CANON L 色彩

以上大光圈計 1.4--2 VS 2

CANON 35 2 樣樣平均優良 35L 中間絕好優異 L 色彩
但35 2 周圍大光圈時 好D

CANON 回收價好好多

L 鏡貴5倍 光葉圈圓D
CANON 原廠鏡 35 F2 比 TOKINA 好

[scuba.diver]

Wow, C Hing 們幫忙分析真係好。

[rexhkg]

CANON*6

[h0001244]

Every lens is specifically designed. 35/2 for larger apreture and tokina has shorter MFD.
What benefits you more?

[scuba.diver]

Well, thanks to all C Hings again since these all are valuable for reference.

In fact, I have all 3 brands lens (Canon, Sigma and Tokina), so their control and quality are basically understood.

For me, Tokina can relatively give lighter weight (to C 35/1.4L) and higher flexibility, i.e., Macro (to S 30/1.4 and others).

For build quality, quite confident that it is not lower than C 35/1.4L or Sigma 30/1.4.

For picture quality, I have no doubt that C 35/1.4L should be much better than others but it would not 2.5 times better than Tokina (since the price is 2.5 times than T). hehehehe.

For 2nd hand value, no need to say C is higher than others which I have experience to sell before.

One last concern is, Tokina 35/2.8 is not FF lens, while C and S lens can be used at FF body, however, FF is not my interested side since it require higher standard lens and I cannot find a good reason to have such high quality pictures in my daily living.

Still, give some more time before making up my mind.