[ming791222]

如果唔加filter去影，d相影出黎會唔會差d呢？

[zoemui]

不如咁講，加左Filter可以令效果提升。

[h0001244]

I don't use filter and photos are better IMHO

[bananawong]

唔加的話！好易會。 好後悔！

[soonerorlater]

一般的UV filter作用多數是以保護鏡頭第一塊鏡片多於實際用途，唔加萬一鏡片花了，就喊都無謂。

[Thomas1]

唔用唔會差 filter如果太厚鍍得唔靚 下降鏡解折度銳利 有偏差

[小小生]

加左平價filter就可能會差d
唔加一定係最好,最靚的filter就係影響最少

[h0001244]

Of cos, if it is L lens, you should use a UV filter to protect your lens.
But if your lenses are as cheap as mine, say 50.8, a acceptable filter would cost you over the half of the lens price. It's just not worth to do so. If you buy a cheaper UV filter for that reason, the degrade in image quality would tell you that no filter would be better than cheaper filter. Lens hood could serve the same purpose as well.

[ming791222]

但有些mc uv filter標榜加左之後比之前更好

[大口手手]

一向都冇用 Protector . . . . 多年來一D事都冇!

[BITTE]

甘樣講啦, fliter 係保護你既鏡頭, 更容易清潔, 同埋有唔同既效果.

我用個比喻可能會好d : 好似你一隻眼, 唔帶眼鏡係永遠最清晰, 如果加片防 uv 既鏡片呢? 甘o米防uv law, 如果帶黑超呢 ? 甘o米 = cpl
明未 ?

[yung2]

唔加最好，清潔時都整少啲野~