[louis7177]

買17-55f2.8 17-40f4L 好D?

[eric288]

睇你而家用緊咩機, 同埋有有打算上FF....

[louis7177]

450D

[syk2c11]

17-55 2.8 for sure if you are not upgrading to FF in the near future.

[Obi-Wan]

17-55 2.8 is the king of all EFS lens, have L lens class picture quality, have $ buy it for 450D lah!!!

[bbhello]

用450D 就17-55啦...絕配...2.8光圈 正~~
如果有打算會換FF既~~就一定係 17-40 L

[Xplore]

應該係

用450D 就17-55啦...絕配...2.8光圈 正~~
如果有打算會換FF既~~就係 『24-70 f2,8 or 24-105 f4,0』

20D / 350D 時代搶著買
家陣反而好少見 FF 用 17-40 f4,0 .......唔知點解

[haroball]

17-40好似變左EF-S鏡
因為玩5D的朋友們都不考慮這支...
起碼我個班朋友仔係....

[Obi-Wan]

17-40 on APS-C body is wasted, many other choices of similar price are better, e.g. 17-55/2.8 or even A16

of course if u have full frame, 17-40 is a good lens.

My 17-40 kept in dry cabin over 2 years no use after my 5D was sold.

[aku1121]

之前由1740 轉了 1755
對比1740貴了 ,手感差了 ,入塵日日多2粒 ,f2.8 畫質麻麻, 收到 f4就叫做ok ,色淡 (尤其對比1740) ,個is係幾好玩 明顯手震都望落好定 ,不過好易壞 玩幾個月一開is就畫面狂震 ,比$整返後心都淡埋賣鬼左去 ,如果apsc 都係建議a16 想影人靚d加支50.4 /85.8一定好過用1755 ,同埋哩d價錢 . . .都係買返 L 有保證D

[Xplore]

咁相對 A16, 17-55mm 贏原廠 / USM / IS / Tele 多 5mm

論盡質我揀返 A16

[Sparky1]

I think A16 is better value for money on ASP-C. But I also have a S50.4 for people shots, plus 24-105L for general outdoor purposes...covers my range.