| 上個主題 :: 下個主題 | 
  
    | 作者 | 訊息 | 
  
    | haroball
 
 
 
 
 註冊: 2008-09-08
 
 上載我的肖像
 | 
        
          |  問題幾個!!!!!     Post time: 7 月 26 日 |  |  
          | 
 |  
          | 我現在用6d 是24-105kit
 
 我想問24-105 f4 同 24-70 f4
 真係差幾班嗎(差價差不多4xxx)
 
 我以家用差價買了以下東西
 85 1.8 ($3080)
 40 2.8 ($1090)
 (其實以上兩支只用過 一兩次)
 
 以家我有朋友想6d配鏡
 我見我以家好似好低
 
 但係佢又對支24-70 f4 好有興趣
 我應該比咩意見佢好
 
 謝謝意見先
 
	
	
 |  | 
  
    |  |  | 
  
    |  | 
  
    | 叮噹仔
 
 
 
 
 註冊: 2005-01-03
 
 上載我的肖像
 | 
        
          |  Re: 問題幾個!!!!!     Post time: 7 月 27 日 |  |  
          | 
 |  
          | http://www.the-digital-picture.com/Reviews/Canon-EF-24-70mm-f-4-L-IS-USM-Lens-Review.aspx |  | 
  
    |  |  | 
  
    |  | 
  
    | CANONMARKIII
 
 
 
 
 註冊: 2012-03-12
 
 上載我的肖像
 | 
        
          |  Re: 問題幾個!!!!!     Post time: 7 月 27 日 |  |  
          | 
 |  
          | 首先唔太明你講咩, 係o米 ' 而家 ' , 唔係 '以家' 
 如果你問 24-70 f4 同 24-105 f4 分別.
 
 我覺得當然新既鏡絕對好過舊....科技ma.
 
 不過我如果kit set 我都會用番 24-105 ~~ 真係好鏡.
 
 24-70 唔係唔好, marco 又有. 不過就無左 70-105 果段.....
 
 我自己就 5d3 + 24-70 ii, 夠晒啦...因為真係睇你影咩, 如果only影 '沙龍'
 
 6d 夠晒用, 又可以wifi 同 remote, 用黎lum 女最正 ^^
 
 入埋枝 50.2 就good 晒, 我自己就 6d + 50.2 / 6d + 35.4 都影過, 可能真係太
 
 易走火, 50.2 係好正好cream, 不過好易抄, 反而 35.4 就易用好多, 成功率高.
 |  | 
  
    |  |  | 
  
    |  | 
  
    | zoemui
 
 
 
 
 註冊: 2008-05-25
 
 上載我的肖像
 | 
        
          |  Re: 問題幾個!!!!!     Post time: 7 月 27 日 |  |  
          | 
 |  
          | 唔怕重就2.8...定焦已無視。 |  | 
  
    |  |  | 
  
    |  | 
  
    | 千紅
 
 
 
 
 註冊: 2012-05-18
 
 上載我的肖像
 | 
        
          |  Re: 問題幾個!!!!!     Post time: 7 月 27 日 |  |  
          | 
 |  
          | 用過24-105,坦白說除了方便(有IS,有24-105),靚仔,平之外 (其實幾多優點) 畫質是真的普普通通 
 不夠銳利外,廣角變形又嚴重,總之是軟的感覺 , 真係mama地。
 即使收了光圈至f11,跟28-70L(上上代大三元) 的F11比,也是明顯的有差 。
 
 追求畫質的,不要考慮。
 
 (我持有28-70L,用過24-105,24-70L 。       未用過24-70F4 , 24-70f2.8ii).
 |  | 
  
    |  |  | 
  
    |  | 
  
    | cookiemerry
 
 
 
 
 註冊: 2004-01-26
 
 上載我的肖像
 | 
        
          |  Re: 問題幾個!!!!!     Post time: 7 月 27 日 |  |  
          | 
 |  
          | If C 24-70 f4 better buy Tamron 24-70VC 
 If for normal use best is 24-105 Kit   70-105 果段 very useful
 |  | 
  
    |  |  | 
  
    |  | 
  
    | kennysansan
 
 
 
 
 註冊: 2012-05-04
 
 上載我的肖像
 | 
        
          |  Re: 問題幾個!!!!!     Post time: 7 月 27 日 |  |  
          | 
 |  
          | 剛看完樓上貼嘅 link 對24-70f4 嘅review, 也有對24-105 的比較,如果想買其中一支,應該一看。 
 24-70f/4 跟24-105 畫質差不多,其它就各有各好:
 These two lenses have similar image quality with each winning specific comparisons.
 
 焦段各有各 sharp:
 At 24mm with a wide open aperture, the 24-70 f/4 L IS bests the 24-105 L IS in sharpness by a modest amount. The 24-105 L delivers a sharper image at 50mm f/4. Sharpness improvement at 70mm brings the 24-70 f/4 L IS back up to near equality with the 24-105 L
 
 在f/11, 兩支都超sharp:
 If you are shooting at f/11, the 24-70 f/4 L IS, 24-105 f/4 L IS and 24-70 f/2.8 L II lenses produce essentially equally excellent sharpness.
 
 要影Macro 就24-70f4:
 I'm not going to say that this lens is as sharp as the Canon 100mm L Macro Lens, but the Canon 24-70 f/4 L IS Lens' macro mode is very impressive
 
 要影人有好嘅散景就24-105:
 While a 24-70mm f/4 lens is not going to be considered amazing for its background blur creation capabilities
 
 總結,24-70f4性價比較低:
 Overall, the 24-70mm f/4 L IS USM Lens is a great lens, but ... perhaps overpriced at review time with the bargain-priced Canon EF 24-105 f/4 L IS Lens remaining available. Unless you factor in the very significant macro capabilities.
 |  | 
  
    |  |  | 
  
    |  | 
  
    | CHUNG聰
 
 
 
 
 註冊: 2011-01-15
 
 上載我的肖像
 | 
        
          |  Re: 問題幾個!!!!!     Post time: 7 月 30 日 |  |  
          | 
 |  
          | 有錢浪費下既就24-70 f/4, 性價考慮一定係24-105 f/4 我唔覺得兩支鏡影出黎既質素差別有$4000..
 俾著我要買24-70既就買24-70 f/2.8..
 |  | 
  
    |  |  | 
  
    |  | 
  
    |  |