[mo-lala]

我係DSLR既新仔，請問如果買50D，但我唔想買Kit鏡(18-200mm)，咁可以買咩鏡呢？或者點配d鏡呢？我唔怕帶2,3支鏡出街的，因為我覺得換鏡係DSLR既樂趣，而且各支鏡有佢地既優點及不足之處， 邊有可以一鏡走天崖咁好呢？我想影人，影景及學埋影景深咁！小弟金錢有限，只預了$13000-$14000買機連鏡，請幫幫忙比d意見！唔該晒

[upatchow]

17-55 F2.8

最好C記~A16/ S記都得

另外買支12-24 FF鏡~咁就VERY GOOD啦

[sunav]

我也同你一樣關注50D

[mo-lala]

12-24 FF係咩鏡？咩牌子？幾錢？小弟無咩錢，我買機連鏡只預 $14,000左右喎！^^

[EY2007]

Suggest two option :

1) 50D body (new $6690) + EF 17-40L (new $5600) + EF 50 f1.8 (new $700) = $12990

or

2) 50D body (new $6690) + Tamron 17-50 f2.8 (second $2000) + Tokina 11-16 f2.8 (second $3900) = $12590

[mo-lala]

50D Body 賣 $6690 ? 係唔係行貨架？係邊度買？好抵喎！ ^^
支Canon EF 17-40L 都有師兄推薦過，不過佢話: " 要接受佢冇防震同埋光圈細小小，低光時不方便手持拍攝,要用腳架，淺景深就冇乜架喇,要加多支50mm f1.8！" 即正如 EY2007 兄所講！其實光圈細少少同埋無防震，對我呢d新手影響大唔大？我想係長遠計，因為支鏡玩一陣就要換好浪費錢！ ^V^

[phyllis_110]

其實mo-lala係影咩多??
要wide定遠先??
唔同情況就會用唔同既鏡..
無可能一支鏡可以影晒所有野
不如講下你會影咩, 等師兄佢地再對中要點咁介紹俾你咁咪仲好,,,

[EY2007]

EOS 50D body (New $6990) ---> CAM2 (water goods including 1 year warranty by CAM2)

If you like canon len, you choose 1 option. Due to your budget only $14000, so I suggest you buy EF 17-40L & EF 50.8. (because you buy Hong goods EOS 50D body, you will pay about $8000).
Landscape (outdoor) ----> EF 17-40L or EF 50.8 ---> no problem.
Portraits (indoor) -----> EF 17-40L (with build-in flash) or EF 50.8

If you choose 2 option, two lens are f2.8 (Tokina 11-16 f2.8 & Tamron 17-50 f2.8). f2.8 len is very good under indoor or low light conditions. you can check review forum for these two lens comment.

[Obi-Wan]

I bought the 50D+18-200 Kit last year, at first I was disappointed much with the quality of the 18-200 lens, it appears as poor as my other kit lenses of Canon (18-55 non-IS, 17-85IS). The CA of this lens is very very serious below around 24 mm.
Later after visited some Japanese sites & shooting RAW (the CA can be easily corrected), I knew the characteristic of this lens.
I am very very happy with this lens now.

Of course if u shoot jpeg, u can forget about this lens, buy Tamron A16 or 17-40 if u want to upgrade to FF.

[mo-lala]

我會影人、影景，影淺景深，至於影遠野，可能比較少，反而影wide既機會會多好多就真！ ^V^

[mo-lala]

你地好好人呀，而且意見又中立，真係好多謝你地呀！希望繼續幫幫我，等我加入Canon DSLR既大家庭，繼續比多d買鏡意見我啦！唔該晒！^^

** 我會影人、影景，影淺景深，至於影遠野，可能比較少，反而影wide既機會會多好多就真！

[火Ken]

Tokina 16-50mm f/2.8 係good嫁，2.8光圈同 支鏡 乘1.6後，25.6-80mm 個 range都幾實用，但價份就$4000幾，個質素係sharp！

[Thomas1]

mo-lala 朋友,

as Long term 17-40 L(色好,型)
經濟短線 Tamron A-16 ok ga (我覺得色水暗d), 以後 用FF 報廢

以上2 支影景,行街幾好.


我推薦你用17-40 L, canon user 有支紅圈吧.影景,街景 F4 夠.

影人最好用定焦. 用變焦2.8 ,在光學質素 和淺景深 同定焦大光圈唔同level.

影相要求高冇可能只用一支鏡

[t-wing]

我覺得考慮得 17-40L, 就不如買Canon 17-55 F2.8
如果唔係, A16就係非常正路既選擇.

[calwkf]

"50D Body 賣 $6690 ? 係唔係行貨架？係邊度買？好抵喎！ ^^
支Canon EF 17-40L 都有師兄推薦過，不過佢話: " 要接受佢冇防震同埋光圈細小小，低光時不方便手持拍攝,要用腳架，淺景深就冇乜架喇,要加多支50mm f1.8！" 即正如 EY2007 兄所講！其實光圈細少少同埋無防震，對我呢d新手影響大唔大？我想係長遠計，因為支鏡玩一陣就要換好浪費錢！ ^V^ "

To: mo-lala

其實最遠焦距只是40mm, 就算冇防手震都應該唔駛太擔心, 至於大光圈就真係要諗諗, 不過我個人認為如果想玩大光圈, 可以買多枝 50mm f/1.8 黎玩住先, 幾佰蚊, 超低玩, 之後就算要二手放返出去都係蝕小小. (我就會keep佢一世, 因為價錢平, 質數都唔太差. ^^)