[RRR789]

如果只會 一機一鏡的選擇,大家覺得選那支好呢? 50D

[430707]

24-105

[zeater]

24-105 f/4 較輕便,亦較 tele,有IS;
24-70 f/2.8 有較大光圈, 而且我認為24-70 f/2.8 既成像質素較好.

我比較buy24-70 f/2.8 啦.

[leolsliu]

最好有24-135mm f/2.8 L USM 定焦

不過現有鏡頭我會選 24-105 f/4 方便旅行

[zeater]

老老實實, 我去旅行都未拎過中焦. 24mm on 50D = 38.4mm, 影景唔多夠wide.
如真買了中焦,亦只買了中焦, 得要接受佢唔夠wide啦, 影景有限制喲...
(我去旅行拎 17-40, 多數加多支 70-200.)

RRR789 c-hing, 其實你影'mud' 比較多? 我怕兩支鏡都唔合適....
人像就 24-70 f/2.8.

[老叟]

24-135龍仔有喎,仲係SP名鏡黎架

[iso_ray]

只會 一機一鏡<<<
一定24-70 F2.8, 原因焦距好多時可以自己就, 但光圈永遠無得變大, 唔夠大就係唔夠大, 無得攪, 同埋24-70 F2.8成像正D

[Obi-Wan]

老叟
Tamron 24-135 NOT f2.8 also NOT fixed f no. (f/3.5-5.6)

"SP名鏡黎" <----- famous in serious chromatic aberration

[cy001]

24-70 f/2.8 有較大光圈

[bzboy]

24-70 f/2.8 大光圈, 事實佢既成像質素顏色都較好.

Buy 24-70 f/2.8 啦.

[Goldfinch]

追求靚, 24-70 F2.8
輕便, 24-105 F4

我覺得24-105已經幾重(去旅行計), 24-70太辛苦

[mcster]

RRR789, ths for bringing up this subject. As I'm asking the same question as well :)

someone told me that there's some sort of CANON internal rumors that 24-70 F2.8 have some sort of problem.

While 24-105 F4 was a WELL made lens.

I personally go for 24-70 F2.8

[loveangelstep]

我都喺呢2支鏡之間struggle緊
用嚟影狗仔...邊支會適合啲呢??

[mcster]

Exclude the fact that 24-105F4 is around $2,000 cheaper, the only advantage of 24-105F4 is the extra 70~105 range, IS and lighter weight, but dissapointingly that at the 70~105mm range is hard to focus on moving objects.

And for "IS", "IS" is battery consuming, if u have the "IS" on the whole time your battery time will reduce almost 50%. I don't think you you want to run out of battery during your trip or to carry extra battery.

And only undefeatable ADV is lighter weight.

Afterall, I know 24-105F4 is a very well built lens, but I once saw somone post "大光圈才是皇道" and I totally agree with it

[mcster]

re: 我都喺呢2支鏡之間struggle緊
用嚟影狗仔...邊支會適合啲呢??

I suggest u spend another $2,300 and get a 50F1.4 or a $60050F1.8

because 狗仔 and BB仔 both moves too fast...