[少三少]

本人用緊450d , 17-40L, 501.8, 70-300 IS

唔計BUDGET......重相片利唔利、色靚、好用焦距

買50D+24-105, 17-40 換10-22 好，或是..
買5D MARK 2 KIT SET 好??

本人考慮50D+24-105 ，X1.6既話就係38-135....影人好似OK WOR...平時映下幾個人集體照都好似應付到，去旅行先用支10-22影景。

考慮5D MARK2 係因為已有17-40，買KIT SET 就齊晒，像素好似高D，iso 高d，多野玩D....不過個range 好似都係差d，話有105mm，但都好似=apsc 既65mm...又好似唔係好遠甘....

[hongdonald]

24-105 is for FF machine,,,,i don't think it has a good range on ASPC

[RRR789]

本人現用緊這兩部機中, 如兩部也在手我會選5DII好用, 但只可揀擁有一部的話, 我揀50D, 冇法外出打仗時, 50D可x1.6後 的確方便很多, 除非你只影景,或只影人像( 單對單式影法 不雖跟人争位影的情況下) 就是5DII最完美, 高ISO用法.如果不是, 就想下自己會影咩多, 才決定買那部吧.

[jsklee]

5D Mk II must be better in terms of image quality.

[10099644]

有錢當然5d2

[fish30d]

If budget allows, keep your 450D, buy 5d MkII kit set (i.e. with 24-105), buy 100-400L (Big White), sell the rest of your lenses.

I used to have a 30D sold it years ago and now have a 5D MkII. I have 24-105, 70-200 F4IS and 1.4x. On the 5D MkII, the 70-200 is not adequate even with the 1.4x. I am planning to sell the 70-200 and buy a 2nd hand 50D and 100-400. 50D for serious zooms and 5D MkII for normal use.

[william_lau]

其實5D2的像素高達2100萬，代表著佢亦有好大剪裁空間，而此機在高ISO的表現係相當優秀的，在高焦距下，可以用較高ISO而用得到較高快門而質素亦不會下降，所以樓主唔駛咁擔心。 不如你問下遠攝你對係咪真係好重要先。

[Obi-Wan]

I have 2 combos
50D+10-22
5D2+17-40/f4L

I only use the first one, because (1) lighter, (2) greater depth of field (3) quality u cannot distinguish from 5D2+!7-40

if u don't believe, please goto check
part 1
http://203.194.133.168/media/sharing/09/03/15/1577661237048502_l.jpg
part 2
http://203.194.133.168/media/sharing/09/03/15/1577661237048587_l.jpg
part 3
http://203.194.133.168/media/sharing/09/03/15/1577661237048649_l.jpg
part 4
http://203.194.133.168/media/sharing/09/03/15/1577661237048723_l.jpg
part 5
http://203.194.133.168/media/sharing/09/03/15/1577661237048774_l.jpg
part 6
http://203.194.133.168/media/sharing/09/03/15/1577661237048823_l.jpg

CAN U GUESS WHICH PHOTOS ARE TAKING WITH 5D mark2?

[少三少]

PARt 2,3,6係5d
part 1,4,5係係50d???

thx 各位映友意見~

[fish30d]

Obi-wan,

I agree 50D is pretty close to 5D MkII to most amateurs, and I confess when I did your test I only got 2 out of 3 by 5D MkII right. However, I think when taking landscape you can get away with it, but if you do the comparison on portraits I think the difference between 50D and 5D MkII will be very substantial.

[iso_ray]

2,3,5====5d

[少三少]

其實我係映人多~~

[bmsmaster]

但只可揀擁有一部的話, 我揀50D, 冇法外出打仗時, 50D可x1.6後 的確方便很多, 除非你只影景,或只影人像
==============================
呢d唔係鏡頭問題咩?

點解關部機事?

[canonu]

50D可x1.6後 的確方便很多
==============================

睇小咗仲方便咗? 其怪問問..

[wesleyyau]

Ching 話: "冇法外出打仗時, 50D可x1.6後 的確方便很多"
400mm * 1.6 => 640mm
如果冇*1.6俾你拎支600mm去打杖... 真係辛苦到呢...
canon 支684 5360g... 真係唔係講少..