上個主題 :: 下個主題 |
作者 |
訊息 |
quickenaway2
註冊: 2009-03-16
上載我的肖像
|
Marco len Post time: 5 月 16 日 |
|
|
本人用50D, 想買一支MARCO 鏡用來影花影虫, 唔知買100mm f2.8 好定60mm f2.8 好. 想問問其他師兄意見. ((相信短期內都不會轉 FF 的))
|
|
|
|
 |
Obi-Wan
註冊: 2006-02-06
上載我的肖像
|
Re: Marco len Post time: 5 月 16 日 |
|
|
100 2.8!
|
|
|
|
 |
430707
註冊: 2007-07-07
上載我的肖像
|
Re: Marco len Post time: 5 月 16 日 |
|
|
我都suggest 100 f2.8
|
|
|
|
 |
kklling
註冊: 2009-02-01
上載我的肖像
|
Re: Marco len Post time: 5 月 16 日 |
|
|
If I am using 5D Mark II, what should I use? Should I consider 180 3.5 also, of course it is much more expensive, Would CHing please give me advice.
Thx
|
|
|
|
 |
quickenaway2
註冊: 2009-03-16
上載我的肖像
|
Re: Marco len Post time: 5 月 16 日 |
|
|
多謝Obi-Wan 兄及430707 師兄意見, 再想問問, 如買二手百微, 當中有USM 及非USM, 我知道USM 是較新的, 除了摩打之外, 是否沒有其他分別?
|
|
|
|
 |
uubb
註冊: 2009-05-13
上載我的肖像
|
Re: Marco len Post time: 5 月 16 日 |
|
|
60mm for sure!
my friends have both and I have tested them seriously
60mm gives much sharper pictures. Trust me or try it yourself!
100mm is good for future use if you are planning to move to FF.
If you are going to stay ASP-C, then just get 60mm!
100mm let you to shoot objects which are farther away from you. (e.g. the bird on the tree)
But if you are taking pics with objects which are close to you (e.g. bugs, leaves...etc.) then you MUST use 60mm!
60mm is also good for shooting products (e.g. watches, toys..)
|
|
|
|
 |
Obi-Wan
註冊: 2006-02-06
上載我的肖像
|
Re: Marco len Post time: 5 月 16 日 |
|
|
60 mm gives sharper image probably because it has a larger DOF then 100mm (my 100/2.8 usm macro is very very sharp, since I don't have 60mm to compare, may be 60mm reli sharper as uubb said)
|
|
|
|
 |
uubb
註冊: 2009-05-13
上載我的肖像
|
Re: Marco len Post time: 5 月 16 日 |
|
|
I will try to post some pics later. 60mm is really sharper. I try to shoot a watch and I can even see the very tiny flaws of the metal. I am using the same camera, same setting, same lighting condition.
When you view the pictures in 100%, you can see the difference clearly.
But 100mm is also a great macro lens, especially if you plan to move to FF in the future.
|
|
|
|
 |
ks chung
註冊: 2005-05-12
上載我的肖像
|
Re: Marco len Post time: 5 月 16 日 |
|
|
可以考慮,死馬150mm F2.8.很多人玩影生態和蝴蝶用.
上網看看.
|
|
|
|
 |
Philippe
註冊: 2003-06-01
上載我的肖像
|
Re: Marco len Post time: 5 月 16 日 |
|
|
影蟲焦距長D好,180mm都唔係多.100mm影人就長,影微距去到1:1時工作距離其實得四,五吋左右.好易嚇走一D會飛走既昆蟲.所以影蝴蝶熱門地方你唔多會見人用100mm鏡的.不過長焦距貴之餘會易手震,有利也有弊.
|
|
|
|
 |
jsklee
註冊: 2002-10-16
上載我的肖像
|
Re: Marco len Post time: 5 月 16 日 |
|
|
for flowers, 60/2.8 is sufficient for non-FF camera; but for insects, you may need to have 100/2.8 or 180/3.5
|
|
|
|
 |
Obi-Wan
註冊: 2006-02-06
上載我的肖像
|
Re: Marco len Post time: 5 月 16 日 |
|
|
Philippe "影蟲焦距長D好" <=== 100% agree!
ks chung "Sigma 150mm 2.8 is also a GREAT macro lens" <=== 100% agree
but u have to choose a copy which is not out-focus. Last time I goto TIN XXXXXX to buy this lens, only one of them is not outfocus on my friends 450D
|
|
|
|
 |
iso_ray
註冊: 2007-10-01
上載我的肖像
|
Re: Marco len Post time: 5 月 16 日 |
|
|
上面兩支我選百微
但要我俾意見---------> 180L
|
|
|
|
 |
wesleyyau
註冊: 2009-03-25
上載我的肖像
|
Re: Marco len Post time: 5 月 16 日 |
|
|
Obi-Wan ching 聽講sigma 鏡十支八支要cal... 係唔係呢個原因? 我都想去tin xxxxx 買呢支鏡... 不過暫時行程緊密... 應該要下半年先可以玩macro鏡... :p
|
|
|
|
 |
Obi-Wan
註冊: 2006-02-06
上載我的肖像
|
Re: Marco len Post time: 5 月 17 日 |
|
|
sigma EX lenses, if fully calibrated, will be very very sharp. But it require some kind of luck. I have 7 sigma lenses, some does not focus well in 350D or 400D but ok when used in 50D or 40D. May be the problem is caused by a combination of the camera and lenses, not just Sigma's fault. That's why I only use 50D or 20D & give up 400D & 350D in the dry cabin
|
|
|
|
 |
|