[littleonion]

請問原廠鏡跟外廠鏡出來的效果有大分別嗎?
如果有, 有幾大?
如果好小分別, 點解重要買原廠?
謝謝指教!

[iso_ray]

影出來的效果唔係睇鏡, 係睇人

>>如果有, 有幾大?
大約手板大

>>如果好小分別, 點解重要買原廠?
香港法例入面無一條係硬性規定要買原廠野, 如果好小分別, 點解重要買副廠?

[littleonion]

>>如果有, 有幾大?
>>大約手板大
你o甘樣答我, 我係咪應該要笑呢?

>>如果好小分別, 點解重要買原廠?
>>香港法例入面無一條係硬性規定要買原廠野, 如果好小分別, 點解重要買副廠
我唔識, 又想買代廠, 新手一名, 所以請教一下姐, 唔好o甘躁!
不過點都say聲thank you!

[jsklee]

小心比obi-wan話你　irrelevant　呀！

[lmichael]

其實近呢幾年, 副廠鏡都真係進步好多, 不過原廠一些的名鏡, 真係會好o的, 因為佢地唔駛理價錢定得太高, 所以最高質素的鏡, 一般都係原廠.

但係....定焦就唔一定, 定焦, 特別係marco, 就副廠同原廠的質素, 分別真係唔大, 最少, 我看唔出.

[petercyc]

"你o甘樣答我, 我係咪應該要笑呢?"

應該要笑! 笑下點解問D咁既問題! 支支鏡都 唔同, 有好有差, 要人點答呢?!

[jsklee]

quote from Ref54: History repeats itself.....

[ks chung]

就要看看你想影D什麽喇!
如果你在日光日白之時,就沒有太大分別!
如果暗暗地的環境,幅廠對焦,可能對不到.
又或者你要影晚霞+人,幅廠就少了D晚霞喇(但原廠要用L鏡)!

[h0001244]

Let me quote an example

Canon 50 1.4 $2500
Sigma 50 1.4 $3900

>>請問原廠鏡跟外廠鏡出來的效果有大分別嗎?如果有, 有幾大?
A bit difference, Sigma 50 1.4 is a bit sharper in centre but canon is sharper at corner. Sigma 50 1.4 perform better of Vig. In term of focus speed, similar. Size, canon is light.

>>如果好小分別, 點解重要買原廠?
Because 原廠 is much cheaper with very similar output lor

[王迦南]

原廠鏡　　Canon EF 50mm F1.4 USM　　$2,950.00
雜嘜鏡　　Zeiss ZF　50mm F1.4　　　　$4,800.00

[h0001244]

And also I read some post before

Some old sigma lens couldn't match with new EOS camera. I don't have such experience, couldn't tell more.

Some function like IS, is not very common in 外廠鏡 few years before.
But now you may find VC, OS...... in tamron and sigma in lens........

Also USM (or HSM) having the similar case

[jsklee]

外廠鏡不一定差過原廠鏡啊！

[littleonion]

明白了, 即係無一定準則, 多謝各位高手!