[dinotsoi]

本人是用50D!正煩腦入哪支鏡好!!
請各位師兄比些意見!!

Canon EF-S 17-55mm f2.8 IS USM or

Canon EF 24-70mm f2.8L USM

[Thomas1]

我覺得 想想17-40 L 再加 50 1.4 ,可有2支,有定焦大光圈.
也是在師兄預算內. 全支持FF...

Canon EF-S 17-55mm f2.8 IS USM ...只可以APS-C( 50D)
Canon EF 24-70mm f2.8L USM .....24X1.6..38.4mm 唔wide

[william_lau]

問下自己有冇計劃不久將來上FF。

[Thomas1]

NO FF 計劃,
17-55 2.8 是好好 ^___^

[dinotsoi]

多謝各位師兄既意見!!

[KLP]

如果24-70 for 50D 個度真係唔好用！
有啲兩頭唔到岸~
用 17-55 你會影得開心啲。
“重有 IS ”

[gzhu]

不如買ef 24-105 4L紅線鏡.

[iceming]

I hv the same question. I am using 40D, plan to sell my kit len and buy either:

1) 17-55, 2.8
2) 24-70, 2.8 or
3) 24-105, 4

After reading the suggestions, I may go for No. 3.

Looking for more advice, please!

[alextyh]

如將來上FF,24-70會好啲.

[panda727]

防潮箱，相機袋就見仁見智la,
相機袋由$100-$4,000都有
防潮箱係唔係一定要電子?雖然深水埗都係賣$300-$500(睇size)
其實腳架($100-$4,000都有), 閃(5d II 以下都有機閃定下) 就後話la. 除非你only影人像or夜景.

個人覺得lens 重要過 body.
eg.: 10k 我會買2nd hand
canon 24-105 4L IS + canon 40D BODY
around 10k-11k 都會有
就算你玩玩下唔玩放出去都有市.(我成日見d人買完幾個月就話無時間/唔識用等等等等....就放二手).
下下full gear,唔洗錢咩....
你估dc咩,一出新就換...(同手提一樣)

以上個人意見,有錯請批評..

[panda727]

SORRY 錯post .....

[h0001244]

If you don't go for full frame, go for 17-55, it's a better choice than 24-70
1.) 17 ->28, 24 -> 38.4 .... 38.4 is good for snap but not for group photo
2.) 17-55 has IS.... the only standard lens in Canon with 2.8 has IS
3.) price is lower compare 24-70 but with L grade lens and image.

the only cons for 17-55
1.) dust goes in easily.
2.) buy a hood as flare appears.

[kmleung]

17-55

[davelyh]

會上FF 就 EF 唔上就 EF-S

本人用緊50D + 17-55 講真入塵都真係幾唔開心
(唔算好勁不過一定有,未影響成象)
唔計入塵影人影景都唔錯 又is 又2.8

本來24-70影人又令又出色 最大問題係貴
但係我有時影風景又到喉唔到肺(WIDE)

唔洗理紅唔紅圈 就手 自己鐘意就買
買相機唔係比人睇係 for 自己影相