[alexee]

如果有500D BODY 邊知劃質好D,(不考慮焦距)THX

[Obi-Wan]

I have both lenses, the picture quality of 17-85 is better. BUT both lenses show serious CA below 24mm. Anyway if u can only keep one, then keep 18-200

[alexee]

Thahk You

[iso_ray]

兩支色水都差dd

[gwu1]

For pic quality, go for 17-40L.

[davy3000]

18-200mm一鏡走天涯但天涯鏡畫質通常都係一搬而17-85mm好容而入塵, 我個人應為不如加多少少錢入24-105mm IS F4好個起碼有機會上FF機都用得到,話曬都係紅圈質數點都有保證

[Sam1983]

真係好睇你想影咩......不過以日常使用的方便性而言,18-200可算是足以應付絕大部份攝影場合......

當然如果你對畫質有甚高的要求及執著的話,這支鏡一定滿足不到你

不過,說明它是天涯鏡,想它有L鏡一般的畫質可以說是不設實際......當然,平心而論,這支鏡的畫質其實都不差的,可以說是交足功課

[alan4k]

我有18-200, 用落真係方便, 對焦快(雖然唔係USM), IS好用, 雖然好多師兄師姐話佢PQ唔得, 但天崖鏡就係天崖用途, 同L鏡比係不設實際. $4K好似幾難買到L喎.
不過我覺得$4K樓下會合理d.

17-85又係另類, 呢支kit 只係平, 其他無野好講.

樓上有師兄提議24-105L, 但APS-C 乘1.6會唔夠wide, 要留意.

[公仔佬]

如果你買kit set?
推:18-200mm--> 正常情況下...都ok

你如果要畫質好d...請你進一步下多一層地獄...向L鏡看.

(你玩得相機...就是進了地獄..哈哈)

[alexee]

thanks all brother ^^

[eddie_fys]

************ 24-105 IS USM **************
L鏡,IS,USM,F4恆定光圈 $6000左右
18-200 $4500

[Obi-Wan]

eddie_fys

24-105 IS USM (hong good not $6000, should be $7550), 2nd hand above $6000
ALSO 24mm is NOT wide enough on APS-C

18-200IS USM water good well below $4000

if have $4000
1st choice, 18-55IS + 55-250IS
2nd choice, 17-85IS (2nd hand, below $2000) + 55-250IS
3rd choice, Tamron A16 or Sigma 18-50mm F2.8 EX DC MACRO+ 55-250IS (2nd hand)