[winalltime1]

唔知配EF 70-200mm f/4L IS USM 定EF 70-200mm f/2.8L USM好！
請比d意見

[Canon Ball]

I will choose the f/2.8. Do you take a lot of indoor photos?? If you do, the F/4 IS is helpful. But I can always make use of f/2.8 more than f/4 because my hand don't shake that much.

[ckf593]

我抬不起EF 70-200mm f/2.8L USM，
所以，唔洗講啦~~~~
配EF 70-200mm f/4L IS USM 啦~~~~~~~~~~~~

你夠力抬，就f/2.8L USM。朋友！

[cy001]

70-200 f2.8 without IS is not too heavy.

[火Ken]

我用70-200mm is 4L ，起碼有IS，2.8L無IS；同埋2.8L重d，買4L時我都在手上比較過，可能我技術不足，又或者我之前用Sigma呢個range，分別4L係good添，但2.8L到我手未發揮到掛，不過我聽攝影師父講其實某情度有IS都係差不多，現在4L IS及 2.8L non IS比較，就有IS好啦！

[liyfk]

70-200 2.8L is

[gwu1]

長焦嚟講，IS好重要，所以我揀f４LIS。仲輕D添。

[king22]

呢兩支鏡我最後買了70-200mm2.8L.

[BomBoy-W]

呢兩支鏡我最後買了70-200mm2.8L.
------------------------------------------------
me too

[BIGBUS]

I bought 70-200mm f/4 L. Quite good! Snapshot is easier because the weight of the len is much lighter!

[BIGBUS]

Sorry! The len I mentioned above should be 70-200mm f/4 L IS.

[winalltime1]

綜合各位師兄意見
死就死啦,唯有狠心決定買2.8 IS

[Canon Ball]

Good choice brother 2.8 IS. You will never regret!!

[ckf593]

我最後買了70-200mm4L. IS


打雀唔夠用！

[lightcreator]

70-200 4 better balance

70-200 2.8 better with extender