| 上個主題 :: 下個主題 |
| 作者 |
訊息 |
carsfans
註冊: 2009-07-15
上載我的肖像
|
 17-40 F4 L USM 影景。。 Post time: 8 月 2 日 |
|
|
|
各位師兄..我用緊500D..現有24-105+55-250..啱啱放左KIT LEN，想買ｗｉｄｅ少少既鏡用黎影景....17-40 F4 L USM OK嗎？有無其他介紹？
|
|
|
|
 |
nwt15
註冊: 2005-05-09
上載我的肖像
|
| Re: 17-40 F4 L USM 影景。。 Post time: 8 月 2 日 |
|
|
|
17 乘1.6 之後變咗27 喇喎, 你介唔介意先? 你會唔會考慮ef-s 鏡呀?
|
|
|
|
|
carsfans
註冊: 2009-07-15
上載我的肖像
|
| Re: 17-40 F4 L USM 影景。。 Post time: 8 月 2 日 |
|
|
|
其實唔係好想買ＥＦＳ，因為會上ＦＦ，所以好煩腦...其他牌子又未用過...唔知買邊隻好...
|
|
|
|
|
baggiojk
註冊: 2009-01-15
上載我的肖像
|
| Re: 17-40 F4 L USM 影景。。 Post time: 8 月 2 日 |
|
|
|
10-22 買0左一定唔會後悔.....
|
|
|
|
|
hoitsingcourt
註冊: 2008-10-31
上載我的肖像
|
| Re: 17-40 F4 L USM 影景。。 Post time: 8 月 2 日 |
|
|
|
baggiojk: I agree with you!!
|
|
|
|
|
HelloSRV
註冊: 2008-06-05
上載我的肖像
|
| Re: 17-40 F4 L USM 影景。。 Post time: 8 月 2 日 |
|
|
|
Keep 500D and later 5DII at the same time.
|
|
|
|
|
Obi-Wan
註冊: 2006-02-06
上載我的肖像
|
| Re: 17-40 F4 L USM 影景。。 Post time: 8 月 2 日 |
|
|
I have 5D2 & 17-40, but very seldom use. I use 50D+10-22 because it is lighter & picture quality more or less the same as 5D2+17-40.
10-22 is the EFS lens with L quality in a plastic finishing. Can well compared with FF 17-40 +5D2
|
|
|
|
|
fish30d
註冊: 2007-07-24
上載我的肖像
|
| Re: 17-40 F4 L USM 影景。。 Post time: 8 月 2 日 |
|
|
If you are serious about upgrading to FF, then buy 17-40, otherwise, 10-22 will not disappoint you! When I had my 30D, I used 10-22; 24-105 and 70-200 F4 IS with 1.4x, so my range was 16 - 448mm (1.6x), more than adequate.
Now I have a 5D MkII, so I sold my 10-22 and 70-200 and bought a 100-400, my range is now 24-400 with IS all the way :)))
|
|
|
|
|
carsfans
註冊: 2009-07-15
上載我的肖像
|
| Re: 17-40 F4 L USM 影景。。 Post time: 8 月 2 日 |
|
|
|
多謝各位師兄提點，但如果１０－２２ 同Tokina AT-X 116 PRO DX AF 11-16mm f/2.8比，邊支好ｄ，我見呢支有恆定光圈...同埋副廠鏡係真係會比正廠差?
|
|
|
|
|
Obi-Wan
註冊: 2006-02-06
上載我的肖像
|
| Re: 17-40 F4 L USM 影景。。 Post time: 8 月 2 日 |
|
|
10-22 is better in terms of CA, less CA than tokina
but tokina is sharper
|
|
|
|
|
fish30d
註冊: 2007-07-24
上載我的肖像
|
| Re: 17-40 F4 L USM 影景。。 Post time: 8 月 2 日 |
|
|
Canon 30D 10-22:
|
|
|
|
|
chpj_hk
註冊: 2009-07-18
上載我的肖像
|
| Re: 17-40 F4 L USM 影景。。 Post time: 8 月 2 日 |
|
|
if you consider to buy FF in the future, it is surely to buy 17-40...
Actually, I also will buy 17-40 next week, and Now i am using 400D, but methink will upgrade to 5DmkII soon....
So 17-40mm must be my first choice in ultra wide range lens.
And including CPL B+W, and UV filter, still 6800HKD, so i think it is worthy to buy the "L" lens indeedly!!
|
|
|
|
|
nwt15
註冊: 2005-05-09
上載我的肖像
|
| Re: 17-40 F4 L USM 影景。。 Post time: 8 月 2 日 |
|
|
我以前用350d 加17-40 真係覺得唔夠wide o架, 但係因為由一開始我就決定會上ff, 所以我一路用佢影住先囉...
早兩個月轉用5d2 之後, 原來17 係可以咁wide, 而且仲係我想要嗰種感覺, 所以如果係想上ff, 17-40 就真係一枝唔錯嘅選擇...
|
|
|
|
|
chpj_hk
註冊: 2009-07-18
上載我的肖像
|
| Re: 17-40 F4 L USM 影景。。 Post time: 8 月 2 日 |
|
|
Yes, as a matter of fact, I cant find any reason why not choosing 17-40mm..
And I think if we play the camera, FF must be our ultimate goal!!!
|
|
|
|
|
carsfans
註冊: 2009-07-15
上載我的肖像
|
| Re: 17-40 F4 L USM 影景。。 Post time: 8 月 3 日 |
|
|
|
多謝各位既意見..小弟今日去左試呢兩支鏡..10-22 影水平好正..但打直影好似怪怪地,正常嗎?..17-40無咁wide..但感覺好似sharp D,是否因為恆定光圈?...好難決擇..唔好意思..新手比較多問題..
|
|
|
|
|
| |
