[rtob]

如果我用 500D, 值唔值得投資去買哩支 Canon EF 24-105mm f4.0L IS USM?

因500D又唔support全景幅, 買哩支鏡會唔會嘥$$$呢.

我想買支廣角鏡影風景同影人.

[canon13]

how about 10-22?

[skconrad]

if your budget allow, why not?

I using my 24-105 on 350D over 3 years. it work greats.

for wide angle, if you plan upgrade to full frame, 17-40 will be your choose, if not, 10-22

[Obi-Wan]

if u already has 10-22, then 24-105 will be the perfect partner.

but if u will not switch to fullframe, u may consider this lens.

Anyway it is no harm to buy this lens, as the price of this lens will rise every 1-2 year. It is a good investment on L lens

[shunshunshun]

24-105MM...APS-C 用, 影WIDE唔夠WIDE,
影遠唔夠遠, 我覺得唔岩用囉 ~

[nwt15]

L 鏡唔會買錯, 只係會買貴, 有錢就入啦!!!

[quickenaway2]

24 係唔夠WIDE, 105 亦不夠TELE, 但係呢支鏡好好用, 值得的.

[canonlogy]

標準鏡...係咁架啦!
出支4 - 800 好無....哈哈~
FISHEYE...TELE...都得! 不過可能要兩三個人抬出街!

[crestang]

如果出支18-105 F2.8 or 4L 就好囉！

[GBAmon]

到時個變形又咪不可接受....

[Thomas1]

APS-C 機 用 原廠 EFS 17 - 55 F2.8 is usm. 最好 質素絕對行內頂班

17 - 55 F2.8 is usm 用左 3 塊非球面鏡 再加2塊UD鏡 .
看看 大三元 16 -35 L 也是 如此主要鏡組, 但較 24-70 L多了一塊非球面鏡.

17 - 55 F2.8 is usm 光學素質絕不在 L zoom 之下,所以一直有隱藏L鏡美譽.
因為只支持aps-c , canon 不方便給予紅圈.


24-105 L 是一支最一般的L ZOOM. 變形較多 ,就以同門小三元 17-40相比.
在aps-c 和 FF 畫面看 ,24-105變形較多. 問題是17 vs 24 .
24-105 在 FF 的24mm 有 4.3 % 變形 同時有暗角.....
17- 40 L 在 FF 17 mm 有 3.6 %變形 ,但收至 20mm 己明顯改善.

再看24-105 L 中心 和邊緣 畫質解析一般 ,當然有L 鏡的色水是一定的.

我的意思是24-105 L和17-40L比 ,也差一d, 和其他L鏡,就不用比了.

當然24-105L range 多. 買了紅圈型好多,真也是事實.

本人推介 17 - 55 F2.8 is usm
L 鏡 可以是 16-35 L ,17 -40 L ,24 -70 L

以上 zoom 鏡 ,平時常用的到.

有24-105 L 朋友 ,keep 住當高質travel lens .

[henrynghc]

本人都推介 17 - 55 F2.8 is usm
如影風景同影人.呢個range 應該夠用
17x1.6=27.2mm
55x1.6=88mm
但24x1.6=38.4影風景唔多夠!

[yiu0920]

如果唔打算上FF,投資落L鏡係咪唔值?

[Obi-Wan]

投資落L鏡always值!!!!!

3-4 years ago I bought a hong good 17-40 /f4 L Hong good $4400, now 2nd hand price is around $4400

[choysoaksoak]

I have been using a xxxD, a xxD and a (don't want to 曬命)
all at the same time.

And I have found a combo of
10-22, 17-55, 24-70, 70-200 IS plus a 1.4X
are pretty much enough.

:-)