[micgogo]

Canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8 L USM vs Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8 L II USM


If use Canon 500d take photo (mostly for snap shot), which lens will you choose??

Canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8 L USM
(1) 重d (950g)
(2) 外變焦，易入塵
(3) 舊d (2002)
(4) 拍照目標遠d
(5) 價錢$10380 (ask for Broadway today)
(6) ching 講有移焦情況要Cal ??

Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8 L II USM
(1) 輕d (635g)
(2) 內變焦，防塵好d
(3) 新d (2007)
(4) 拍照目標wide d
(5) 價錢$11680 (ask for Broadway today)
(6) 暫時沒有聽見有移焦情況要Cal

I will buy either one of these two lens within this week, thx for all chings' help~

[shunshunshun]

其實你都係入門機姐, 唔洗用到紅圈咁堅掛 ~

[pongyee]

買得起咪得囉。

[ZeroJKwok]

16-35mm 啦！ 好鏡！

冇話入唔入門機用的，最緊要識得點用，識用識取景的，用係1000Ｄ上都一樣影到靚相 =) 。16-35mm x1.6 = 25.6 - 56mm 叫做有個wide angle，頂得下！

我個攝影師朋友都話是好鏡，叫我有錢都要入一支 =) ，但我現在冇 =.= 要儲下錢先了！

[Kenneth_yuen]

兩支我都有, 不過 16-35mm 真係好少用, 只係出外地時會用到, 平時 24-70mm 做咗標準鏡.
不過 500D 要 1.6x,
24-70 立即變了38.4~112mm, 好似唔係幾夠 Wide.
16-35mm 又變咗 25.6~56mm 好似唔湯唔水,
EF-S 有支 17-55mm f/2.8, 1.6x之後變咗 27.2-88mm 好似好D

[ZeroJKwok]

或者咁？！ 16-35mm 加一支 50mm f1.4 / f1.2 ，咁就ＧＯＯＤ了！補返人像區間，50mm f1.4 / f1.2 個景深又大Ｄ。

[jordan45]

Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8 L II USM la.....

[klchan23]

If you will upgrade to FF in the future...both lens is very good...
I wouldn't buy the EF-S len because it's 2nd hand value doesn't worth to invest.....and it can't be used in FF....I give my EF-S 17-55mm to my friend for free after I switch to FF.

For 500D, 16-35 is little better.

[andytang26]

小弟自己用緊400D都係買左16-35^^而家訂左5D2未取~睇你要影乜囉~如果影人的話24-70應該會好d~但影景的話我16-35 + 400D都覺得好正^^

[henrynghc]

其實點解唔諗諗EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 is usm
約$7300 平佢地$3000
for snapshot 有is & usm
用於500D個range又ok!
當然上FF用唔到
到時賣返出去都唔洗蝕!因為色水唔差得過L鏡!
Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8 L影大頭要行到好近,變得好唔自然!
Canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8 L USM 我都有諗過!
1)好重 -snapshot 好辛苦
2)唔多夠wide
我都係諗L鏡保值D,但最終買了EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 is usm