[bccl626]

本人現用Canon 40D,想買一支長鏡.
現時心水有兩支 ~ "因價錢可接受"
1)Tamron AF18-270mm F/3.5-6.3 Di II VC LD Aspherical [IF] MACRO
但應該未有貨 & 價錢 ?
2)Canon EF 70-300mm f4.0-5.6 IS USM

請給我一些意見,多謝!

[Gondola]

儲多 d 錢 , 入手小小白 is 啦
呢支鏡一定有買貴冇買錯 .

[jim69]

再儲多少少買大白呀！ :-)

[死定了的我]

買得Canon EF 70-300mm f4.0-5.6 IS USM
點解唔買二手小小白(no is)3k尾4k頭左右

[alextao1386]

睇樓主果兩支鏡, 都係想搵有防震0既長鏡, Canon EF 70-300mm f4.0-5.6 IS USM 係唔錯0既選擇, 本人比較偏向用原廠鏡, 有信心D~~
當然小小白(no is)係好0野, 值得推薦, 唔怕麻煩加腳架影就解決手震問題~~

[yung2]

我都買過呢支 EF 70-300mm f4.0-5.6 IS USM, 質素唔錯, 但依家用小小白IS後, 小小白IS真係正好多, 畫質更好, 而對焦速度同準繩度都比前者好得多. 建議儲多d錢買小小白IS一步到位, 抵過以後又換鏡.

[alextao1386]

樓主想搵一支價錢可接受0既防震長鏡, 如果要再儲錢買小小白IS, 可能又要等喇~~ 所以我就建議支二手小小白(non-IS)加腳架, 補償冇IS, 又可以享受紅圈白鏡0既畫質~~

[bccl626]

多謝大家的意見,還有一問 ?
200mm 和 300mm 是否很大的分別嗎? 基本上我是用來影小朋友及動物的.

[wifung]

影小朋友及動物(特別是小朋友)其實唔需要用到300mm, 我用支70~200都用唔盡, 因為 x1.6後已等如320.

如果晤堅持原廠, 可考慮Tarmon 70-200 F/2.8, 雖無防震, 但光圈夠大, 可用快1~2級快門, 仲有埋Marco, 再唔夠就推高D ISO, D40 noise 唔係問題.

堅持原廠鏡頭可能都是因為情意結, 除非真是很Professional 的用途, 例如放大作廣告, 否則現在的副廠鏡其實並不弱的, 難道每次你看相都是放大來逐點看嗎?

[noordin]

The range of 70-300 IS USM is very useful with 40D, you can zoom the children half body from 30 meters away. In my case, I always use it to take my children photo, I always use the range of 300m, because I ways take his photo while he is play. The quality is good, same as the Tarmon (A09) but more colourful. One more thing, the IS can help you to avoid to use 腳架 and it is not a heavy lens, so it is a convinent lens for the long range series.

[bccl626]

Hi Noordin,

You don' t mind can share the picture from 70-300 IS USM.

Thanks

[bccl626]

or 各師兄/姐們, 長鏡photos can share ?
小小白 is , 70-300 IS USM.

thanks

[Siu Kat]

不過55 - 250 f/4-5.6 IS 平好多wor, 質素有冇大分別呢?

[Obi-Wan]

forget about 2)Canon EF 70-300mm f4.0-5.6 IS USM

buy 55-250IS, ok quality for $1700

[yung2]

都係平平地買支55 - 250 f/4-5.6 IS玩住先啦, 有錢先再買小小白IS體會吓咩叫愛不釋手.