[bear910]

本人想係24-70 f2.8L & 24-105 f4L兩枝鏡入面買一枝,但唔知邊枝好,請各位師兄俾d意見~~~
p.s 唔想因為有一枝係大光圈而各位偏向個枝鏡

[orabuln]

2.8 光圈話大唔大... 話細唔細... 影人多... 唔用定焦... 懶得換鏡就買 24-70...

[seamonkey]

我都係由 24-105f4L 換上 24-70 f2.8L，相係靚咗，不過枝鏡真係好重！

[checkylam]

其實2枝都係好鏡黎,要睇你想影咩,如果影風景都極少用2.8啦,通常用8-11什至更細,夜晚就落腳架,如果影人像or室內,2.8就好好多~~

同埋你本身有咩鏡的組合~~如果已有小小白或小白,我覺得入24-70好d,能力許可,可以大d光圈總好過細,大可以set細,但細唔可以set大@@~~

如果未有紅圈(標準或以上),我覺得入24-105好d,range較為廣泛~~

~~~有錯請指正~~~

[wcloh]

上面位師兄說得對, 要睇你影乜和你現在有什麼鏡頭組合, 若果你巳有支長炮, 那麼要105來做乜, 我自己揸DC總係覺2Xmm唔夠, 要1Xmm才夠Y, 不過如果你巳經有支十幾mm則另計, 所以若果我巳經有支長, 那就選前者(甚至可以考慮17-55mm f2.8 IS USM, 有子彈的話).....若果巳經有支短, 就後者吧,
影乜也要考慮, 你無理由揸部坦克去打海戰.....
大光圈始終好啲, 唔係都唔使貴咁多......

[lokman926]

同意上面2位C hing, 用係ASP-C 機, 雖然24-105 係L, 外型又好,但range真係好雞肋, wide 又唔夠wide., tele 又唔夠tele, 又冇大光圈. 如果師兄諗住一鏡既走天涯 24-105 可能係good choice. 如果可以唔係考慮EFS 17-55 USM IS, 再加支小小白下玩下, 有錢既可以要IS, 冇錢既二手non IS 先係$3800到. 2支就夠哂玩. 小弟用左4個月去考慮24-105L 定 17-55 好..終於都擺脫L 鏡心魔一口氣買下50 D + 17-55, 再同朋友24-105L 比較, 先發現冇揀錯, 所以FF 就24-105L la 如果唔係17-55 la !!

希望幫到手..........

[bear910]

其實我只係得枝kit鏡同定焦50.8咋~~
其實我係影人像同風景多,而家學緊影夜景,所以唔知買邊枝好?...........><

[lokman926]

bear910 C Hing,

你宜家用咩body? 有幾多budget先?L 呢個product line 對你有幾緊要?同影咩先?答到呢幾問題你就心目中有target 鏡ga la ....

[Ref54]

Haha....this question appears in DC Fever forum almost once a month.....
Personally, I choose 24-70 2.8L because of it overall superb image quality plus large aperture. The only disadvantage is heavy weight.

I've used this lens since 2006 (with 20D) and its power/quality are fully released when I switch to 5D2 last year. This is the lens I always used nowadays.

[orabuln]

用APS 機... 24mm 唔夠wide... 最好都係用17-55...
影夜影通常都收光圈同用腳架... 24-70 同 24-105 都ok...
如果影人像多... 24-70可以一鏡走天涯...

[bear910]

lokman926 Ching:
我係用緊500D架,我都係預大約$10000左右,我係影風景,人像,夜景多~~~

[h0001244]

There is one more choice
Sigma new 24-70....
lighter weight than canon 24-70 and sharper than canon
cheaper than 24-105 and canon 24-70

[bear910]

h0001244師兄:
上面有位師兄講話24係我部機度唔夠wide,咁係咪應該買17-55好過24-70 or 24-105呢?唔該哂

[h0001244]

bear910,

I tried both 17-55 and 24-105 on aps-c camera......

I love 17-55 more than 24-105...just becos the range of 17-55 is just fit for my usage... I take wedding photos for friends all the time....

17-20 give you the wide for group photos....
55 could just meet my need on snap shots.... of cos no head shots
Though this one is not a L, but it meets the standard of L already....
the only drawback is the dust problem

24 can't give me wider feeling when I need it....
105 is not quite enough for tele photos
but I believe that 24-105 is a very good partner for FF cameras

so, if you would upgrade to FF very soon , 17-55 might not be your choice unless you will use both camera system at a time.
you can goto my review on 17-55

[orabuln]

其實你可以試下出行強制自己唔用18-24果段... 如果都覺得OK 夠用... 咪可以買24-70 or 24-105... 如果唔夠WIDE 咪買 17-55 囉...
我之前用之KIT... 因為影人多... 好多時都唔用 WIDE 果段... 所以上左 24-70L就非常岩用...
每個人嘅要求都唔同... 邊枝適合自己... 答案只有問自己至知...