[Marksman01]

see this link


http://www.fredmiranda.com/forum/topic/809801/65#lastmessage

[h0001244]

7D 好似控制得仲好過 40D，驚人呀！

而D700就最少noise，梗係啦，pixel density 最細, detail 都少了，pixel sharpness 都算低bor


我肯定如果舊5D用了7D Noise Cancel 技術，可能會係現時數一數二最靚畫質的機

[Marksman01]

Yes but you have to notice the D700 details also lost more than the 5D2, see the edges of the bottles

[h0001244]

<<純討論，唔係牽 N C 大戰>>

點解，平時好多人都話Nikon Sharp D，但D相又唔覺wor，
相反成日話 Canon少 noise ，响度就剛剛相反了

如果有埋D3X 比會好D
我唸 pixel density 同級的機比較先見到真張

[william_lau]

我反而覺得話某牌的照片有某某特色的話，一定有佢道理的。 不過而家科技轉得咁快，舊時好有道理的特色，可能都漸漸轉變。 始終大家不停進步，係睇下邊個進步得快咁o者。

[Marksman01]

I found some website regarding D3x the noise rank lower than D700/5D2

<<點解，平時好多人都話Nikon Sharp D，但D相又唔覺wor，
相反成日話 Canon少 noise ，响度就剛剛相反了>>

I think most people just looking at web photos which is restricted by the monitor e.g. 1920x1080 which made affect to the noise outlook. A print out is more appropriate but of cos no one will share comparsion in this century :-)

[buucore]

>I think most people just looking at web photos which is restricted by the >monitor e.g. 1920x1080 which made affect to the noise outlook.

Shouldn't this apply to all the photos taken by different cameras?

I think this is very subjective.

One can like the canon color but not the sharpness.

One can like the nikon sharpness but not the color.

And you didn't know they have retouched the photo to increase the sharpness or not.