[jadisom]

各位師兄。小弟近期想入支長鏡。想問下買邊支鏡打雀會好D。
主打系飛緊既雀。。價錢吾好太貴。。
希望可以幫到小弟

[mo-lala]

試下Canon (70-200 mm) 小小白IS + 1.4x，幾好架！

[Obi-Wan]

最少328， 但飛緊嘅雀唔易影，以前我用大白都好少成功，你不如cheap cheap 地買支55-250係香港公園玩下先啦，又或者用MF 陷阱對焦法影

[petercyc]

Sigma 170-500, 應該係最CHEAP 又有AF既500MM啦. 較果其實都幾好. 雖然冇HSM, 對焦都唔係太慢

[fotohunter11]

Sigma 80-400

[hungkeec]

Canon EF 100-400 mm OK

[andy413hk]

Canon EF 100-400 mm OK
X2

[王迦南]

不如我帶你去打雀現場睇下丫！

[kiktkit]

Canon EF 100-400 mm
X3

[h0001244]

Canon EF 100-400 mm x4
and
Sigma 150-500mm HSM OS

[Marksman01]

400/5.6L is the best with budget considered for BIF

[MN56]

For flying bird, 400 F5.6L is the best.

[Ison]

打雀無500-600mm 根本唔好諗, 一係好似obi-wan 兄講cheap cheap 地買支55-250係香港公園玩下先啦.

[MN56]

For APS-C DSLR, a 400mm lens is equal to 640mm in 135 film camera. So many people can take so many beautiful bird photos by using 135 film camera with 500-600mm lens. Why we cannot do that by using a 400mm lens on a APS-C camera?

[王迦南]

其實大家究竟打過雀未？