[jacmissu]

本人有考慮 16/35...不過太貴..要唸清楚先....
各 c hing 仲有其他好的推薦嘛 ???

[10099644]

24-105

[jacmissu]

我想係wide len bor>.

[Hikerfoon]

24-70L, excellent combo.

[jacmissu]

咁大家認為16-35 係咪好好呢 ??

[quzz]

用得5DM2就唔好慳，用好D既鏡啦
16-35 very good

[lk830_hk]

死馬 12-24,至 wide FF 鏡,配 24-70 唔曬焦距 ^o^

[pizza2005]

a05

[fish30d]

Value for money, 17-40 is 150%

Quality-wise, is 16-35L worth twice the amount? .......................

........................................... Yes!

[Marksman01]

I'm thinking 16-35 before, finally I was considered I'm not series in landscape shooting so I chose the much cheaper S 12-24.

16-35 is good of cos but if WA lens in Canon lens line up, the WA prime have much outstanding in performance. One day if I need best WA lens I will go to 14L, 24L, instead of 16-35

[jacmissu]

thx...marksman01

[kiktkit]

死馬 12-24 X2

[h0001244]

雖然我無WA
但選擇sigma12-24
用過16-35，變形其實明顯的，與其wide到咁上緊都係有變形，咁就寧願以誇張的wide去蓋過變形的困擾……所以選12-24

求畫質要上14L了，但我唔係常拍wide景，故一支14L來得有點浪費，ultilization rate 太低了

不過提醒一下，見此Forum有師兄提過12-24做工良幼不齊，記得帶notebook去試清楚D

[火Ken]

我其實都想入支SIGMA 12-24mm，但我都係驚會大細邊...........

[Marksman01]

I'm lucky, my 12-24 doesn't have this problem. Heard there are 大細邊 case, this kind of defect is difficult to test before you pay.