7 月 21 日 (星期一) | 會員登記|會員中心
Canon 單反討論區
Post new topic   Reply to topic  到最上層  |  回到主題  |  搜尋 
頁數: 1共 8 回應
上個主題 :: 下個主題  
作者 訊息

Wombat88




註冊: 2009-10-12

上載我的肖像
題目Canon EF 100-400mm f4.5-5.6L or EF 400mm f/5.6L USM ???     Post time: 11 月 25 日

which one is better for bird shooting?

I am using 7D and any C-hing can give me advice? tks!

I have a SSW IS already.
Back to top

wesleyyau




註冊: 2009-03-25

上載我的肖像
題目Re: Canon EF 100-400mm f4.5-5.6L or EF 400mm f/5.6L USM ???     Post time: 11 月 25 日

我用緊大白... EF 100-400mm f4.5-5.6L!!!
因為機動性大... 易搵雀... 有IS (雖然得兩級)... 中央成像拍得住456... 邊位就一定冇定焦咁正... 但係多數都光圈全開(或者收一兩級)... 而且用crop 機所以唔係太大影響...
觀看用戶檔案 回覆 Back to top

hotfire009




註冊: 2008-10-14

上載我的肖像
題目Re: Canon EF 100-400mm f4.5-5.6L or EF 400mm f/5.6L USM ???     Post time: 11 月 26 日

我用緊456,定焦加増距鏡pq會好d,唔好處係無is,無zoom揾target難少少..
觀看用戶檔案 回覆 Back to top

Wombat88




註冊: 2009-10-12

上載我的肖像
題目Re: Canon EF 100-400mm f4.5-5.6L or EF 400mm f/5.6L USM ???     Post time: 11 月 26 日

hotfire c-hing, are you using 1.4x or 2.0x?

heard that overall PQ with 1.4x is better than using 2.0x, right?
觀看用戶檔案 回覆 Back to top

fish30d




註冊: 2007-07-24

上載我的肖像
題目Re: Canon EF 100-400mm f4.5-5.6L or EF 400mm f/5.6L USM ???     Post time: 11 月 26 日

Just my peronal opinion, I used to have SSWIS with 1.4x, but now changed to 100-400. I don't think the picture quality of SSWIS with 1.4x is better than 100-400. SSWIS is very good on its own, but once you add 1.4x to it, the pq drops rapidly.

Since Wombat88 c-hing already has SSWIS and he knows what he needs the lens for, then I think 456 is your better choice.
觀看用戶檔案 回覆 Back to top

MN56




註冊: 2003-10-25

上載我的肖像
題目Re: Canon EF 100-400mm f4.5-5.6L or EF 400mm f/5.6L USM ???     Post time: 11 月 26 日

456 is cheaper and better in picture quality. But you need to use a tripod or a monopod if there is in low light environment.
觀看用戶檔案 回覆 Back to top

hotfire009




註冊: 2008-10-14

上載我的肖像
題目Re: Canon EF 100-400mm f4.5-5.6L or EF 400mm f/5.6L USM ???     Post time: 11 月 26 日

我有kenko1.4及2x, 1.4x用於7d重有兩側區域af,勉強可以影下移動物, 而2x就無af,只可用黎影固定物.我提議增培鏡用在L定焦鏡效果會比ZOOM鏡好D,因為L定焦解像能力會高D.
觀看用戶檔案 回覆 Back to top

homankop




註冊: 2009-06-18

上載我的肖像
題目Re: Canon EF 100-400mm f4.5-5.6L or EF 400mm f/5.6L USM ???     Post time: 11 月 26 日

100-400
觀看用戶檔案 回覆 Back to top

老叟




註冊: 2003-04-22

上載我的肖像
題目Re: Canon EF 100-400mm f4.5-5.6L or EF 400mm f/5.6L USM ???     Post time: 11 月 26 日

呢支唔錯,今日見癲搶有貨!!!!
觀看用戶檔案 回覆 Back to top
 
頁數: 1共 8 回應
Post new topic   Reply to topic  到最上層  |  回到主題  |  搜尋 



 討論區列表  |  Need a Login? Register Here 
 User Login
 User Name:
 Password: