[alexis-sky]

Sigma 10-20mm F3.5 EX DC HSM

Canon EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5 USM

Tokina AT-X 11-16mm F2.8 PRO DX

[stephenman02]

我剛 剛買左c記10~22覺得好好!!

[NewToCanon7D]

我用7D 都買了 C10~22 3.5/4.5 USM, 個wide 好好用, 變形可接受.
但要注意: 如用內置燈, 由10mm 到17mm 影相時 (冇+hood), 鏡頭黑影出現在相片下面中問位置呢!! 小心, 小心!
其怪的是,我用 C 70~200 2.8L IS USM 就冇事
(两支鏡口直徑同樣大,反而70~200鏡身長得多呢)
不知是否7D內置燈切計有問題呢?

[Obi-Wan]

Canon EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5 USM
OR
Tokina AT-X 11-16mm F2.8 PRO DX

both very good, not try sigma before

[aquila]

Canon EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5 USM range好d
Tokina AT-X 11-16mm F2.8 PRO DX 用緊好滿意

[AlpinweissM]

Tokina AT-X 11-16mm F2.8 PRO DX 用緊好滿意 x2

[Ison]

16-11=5
22-10=12
F2.8
F3.5-4.5
網友評論
116 好好
10-22 好
以2009交換鏡頭年鑑評分
Tokina 116 Pro DX = 4＊
C記 10-22 = 4.5＊
其實差唔多但116師兄買到先算...

[rayc716]

I've both Canon & Sigma. Canon is much better in sharpness and colour but its distortion is worser.

[wesleyyau]

116呢排都唔係太難買... 不過百記同cmk 都做緊4580 有現貨...
之前聽有ching 講... 星際4480...
年頭買都係4180... =.="
依家連d 副廠鏡都要加... 真係多得d 匯率唔少... 美金成日跌... 等於港玩一齊跌... 唉... 下年年頭分分鐘又加一水... 唉...

[叮噹仔]

如果只係講質數, C10-22 係會比較高DD, 同佢個range 又大D,
但一講到CP值, canon就真係比較貴.
T116 都係一支唔錯既鏡,
Sigma就唔好喇.....成象真係比較差

[rankinelo]

Tokina AT-X 11-16mm F2.8 PRO DX 用緊好滿意 x3

and it is usable @ FF camera @ 15mm and 16mm.

I use it in 450D (11mm to 16mm) as well as my EOS 300 film (15mm to 16mm), both are ok and very sharp, no dark corner

Excellent lens for ultrawide