[ivybibi]

想買支L鏡，主要照小朋友活動時的畫面，室內室外都有，有無好提議??
1. 24-70mm f2.8L
2. 24-105mm f4.0L IS

[cy001]

I chose 24-70 F2.8

[Canon Ball]

Both are very good L Lens. 24-70 have 2.8 f stop and it will be helpful indoor. On the other hand, 24-105 have longer range and with IS.
Those are close comparison, but personally I will choose 24-105 for the IS and longer zoom range, because indoor shots you can use tripod.

[ivybibi]

我本身有支50mm F1.4，係唔係加支24-105 F4.0L IS會比較適合呢??麻煩晒~~

[Canon Ball]

I would think so. So far, I really like the 24-105 and it is also great for travel.
May i ask what body are you using?

[ivybibi]

我用緊Canon 40D!

[Canon Ball]

Great!! Some as me! Go for it!!

[adamssin]

I also have same combination with 24-105 for taking photos with child indoor. I think tripod is no use for indoor use. If you use flash with 24-105 is greater, otherwise, 50 1.4 is better in the environment of indoor without flash'

[gwu1]

喺室內影小朋友活動，要用閃光燈．用閃光燈嘅話，兩支都ｏｋａｙ．我會揀２４－１０５ｍｍ，因為個ｒａｎｇｅ長啲，同埋有ＩＳ．

[Forza]

同小朋友影..我都覺得係24~70mm係好..原因F/2.8.可做到很多背景的效果..其次..晚上唔夠光的情況下,光圈能補足好多..如果次次都要外閃,幫小朋友影的時候.他們唔係太習慣.對小朋友的眼睛都唔係太好..另外幫小朋友影相的時候,大多數都係在仿快影才能出特別的效果和他們最天真的一面,如果又要閃燈來補光,出來的相唔太自然,另外係要買多一支閃燈,不如加少少買支靚鏡.對嗎? 這支鏡放出去都保值d..但係24~105係方便就方便.但對於d相有質素的人來說..點都係欠缺些少..如果我買,我選擇24-70..但係如果你買24-105我都覺得好..因為其他就麻麻..

[gwu1]

我試過如果小朋友喺室內郁嘅話，唔用閃光燈，幾大光圈，快門都係得幾十份之一秒，實係鬆，郁，矇．

[calwkf]

如果影小朋友, 就要睇下你個小朋友幾多歲啦... 如果係兩歲以下, 用 24-70 都ok, 當然它光圈大d, 景深效果會好d, 但如你的小朋友在兩歲以上, 佢活動距離會比較, 24-70 就應該唔係咁夠用, 用 24-105 會比較好.

小弟的個人意見︰影小朋友黎講, 買 24-105 會比較有利.