[biblekwan]

唉....又黎一個煩問題~
我一直都係用緊, 24-70 F2.8 USM 同 5D MK II出去行下影下既~
不過近排發現一個問題.....唔夠WIDE....
一次係上海, 一之係香港(景燈飾) 都覺得唔夠WIDE....同出唔到個種特別既效果.

如果而家買支17-40, 其實會唔會好似......多條魚? 定係真係好有用呢?

:注, 台南個之就24-70 VERY GOOD, 一D都冇想要WIDE D.

THX~!

[lumbak]

It's very best for the cheap budget. But its edge performance is very poor for a full frame camera body. Buy 16-35mm f2.8 for certain improvement than 17-40mm if u can afford. But f2.8 is more for focusing use than for you to take picture.

[Zeiss_T]

>>>>> But its edge performance is very poor for a full frame camera body..........................

17-40 really Poor??
Because I also want to buy for 5d II

[klchan23]

Agree edge performance is poor. But it is the cheapest L wide len....

[biblekwan]

Actually, I do have 24-70 for daily use, so for the Len of wide, I may not use that much..... The price of this 2 len is a huge different, 13K and 5K. So....any other suggestion of wide range? Please~

[ZeroJKwok]

師兄！我都是用5D II同24-70 f/2.8 L的，這個配合真係very nice！真係一支鏡都可以走天涯。只是，我都有你同樣的問題，好似唔多夠wide；我都在掙扎買17-40 f/4.0 L 或16-35 f/2.8 L，價錢當然是一個問題，相差一倍價錢有多；但在變焦、大光圈之下，用去影人像或一些特別的物品，又真係方便、又好景深。

我自己其實都偏向買16-35，但真係好貴，仲要貴過支24-70 =.=！又成Q日冇貨！

[TONG3]

影景唔駛大光圈，我用1d3都係用17-40，不過有錢就別論。

[SleepingIII]

你觉得有需要，就买。

[Foreverho]

各 ching 認為近期出二代機會大唔大？ 話晒都六年啦喎

[siubi09]

我買S12-24 FOR WIDE, 12比17好好多

[wesleyyau]

s12-24 要收少少光圈先sharp... 不過影ultra-wide 好多時唔駛大光圈... 所以呢支ff o黎講真係好正... 24-70 + 12-24 fit 哂...