上個主題 :: 下個主題 |
作者 |
訊息 |
kenanet
註冊: 2009-07-28
上載我的肖像
|
70200 2.8L & 4L Post time: 2 月 7 日 |
|
|
你地會用什麼來決定買2.8定4呢?其實仲有無其他選擇?好頭痛!!
|
|
|
|
 |
ernest0430
註冊: 2008-11-01
上載我的肖像
|
Re: 70200 2.8L & 4L Post time: 2 月 7 日 |
|
|
1) budget
2) 重量
有錢同可以負擔佢既重量 當然係2.8
|
|
|
|
 |
tupac128
註冊: 2009-07-19
上載我的肖像
|
Re: 70200 2.8L & 4L Post time: 2 月 7 日 |
|
|
Have $$$, f/2.8 L IS II
Have $$, f/2.8 L IS I
Have $, f/4 L IS
Secondly, f'2.8 is heavier and more in price, but I will choose bigger f stop which I will need it for limited light environment and faster focus in dark area.
In my opinion, I will choose Canon only because they are simply better.
|
|
|
|
 |
h0001244
註冊: 2007-04-19
上載我的肖像
|
Re: 70200 2.8L & 4L Post time: 2 月 7 日 |
|
|
1. for 70-200, canon is better
2. i will choose 4L, because 2.8L too heavy for me
3. for indoor photos, i rather choose 85.8 for faster focus and letting more light in
4. above are my own opinion only, everyone could have different choices
|
|
|
|
 |
kenanet
註冊: 2009-07-28
上載我的肖像
|
Re: 70200 2.8L & 4L Post time: 2 月 7 日 |
|
|
Thanks All reply .........so if i use outdoor mostly maybe 4L (is or non is) is better for me ! Anyway is that any problem for old version 4L ? I hear it b4 but can't search for the web!
|
|
|
|
 |
homankop
註冊: 2009-06-18
上載我的肖像
|
Re: 70200 2.8L & 4L Post time: 2 月 7 日 |
|
|
I think 70-200 f/2.8L is better,because 質素好過4L
|
|
|
|
 |
Mikuro
註冊: 2010-01-08
上載我的肖像
|
Re: 70200 2.8L & 4L Post time: 2 月 7 日 |
|
|
For my own, I use the 70-200 with my BB so I have chosen from mobility with light weight. Therefore, I have chosen 70-200 F4L IS. :)
|
|
|
|
 |
Obi-Wan
註冊: 2006-02-06
上載我的肖像
|
Re: 70200 2.8L & 4L Post time: 2 月 7 日 |
|
|
Highly recommend /4IS, the sharpest and the best color among the four present 70-200
|
|
|
|
 |
kenanet
註冊: 2009-07-28
上載我的肖像
|
Re: 70200 2.8L & 4L Post time: 2 月 7 日 |
|
|
any compare photo for reference?
|
|
|
|
 |
Obi-Wan
註冊: 2006-02-06
上載我的肖像
|
Re: 70200 2.8L & 4L Post time: 2 月 7 日 |
|
|
http://www.the-digital-picture.com/Reviews/ISO-12233-Sample-Crops.aspx?Lens=103&Camera=453&Sample=0&FLI=4&API=2&LensComp=404&CameraComp=453&SampleComp=0&FLIComp=4&APIComp=0
|
|
|
|
 |
ma_myf
註冊: 2009-12-10
上載我的肖像
|
Re: 70200 2.8L & 4L Post time: 2 月 7 日 |
|
|
我之前都遇過呢個問題, 不過一諗下重量差成倍, 即刻知道點做, 雖然2.8係正, 但要我帶住佢去旅行, 真係唔好講笑....!
|
|
|
|
 |
peterlam199477
註冊: 2010-01-05
上載我的肖像
|
Re: 70200 2.8L & 4L Post time: 2 月 7 日 |
|
|
重量是一個問題
|
|
|
|
 |
speedstar
註冊: 2003-06-10
上載我的肖像
|
Re: 70200 2.8L & 4L Post time: 2 月 7 日 |
|
|
今日先入左支4L
唔計錢既話, 知道自己係乜情況用支鏡多就唔頭痛.
如果係去旅行/行山用, 又係自助遊唔租車, 好似我咁, 就一定係4L, 2.8L更好都冇用, 太重太大支, 買咗只會放係防潮箱.
|
|
|
|
 |
火Ken
註冊: 2007-03-25
上載我的肖像
|
Re: 70200 2.8L & 4L Post time: 2 月 7 日 |
|
|
重量係一個嚴重問題!!
|
|
|
|
 |
bho09
註冊: 2003-04-27
上載我的肖像
|
Re: 70200 2.8L & 4L Post time: 2 月 7 日 |
|
|
I prefer the sharpness of 70-200 F4 IS
Don't argue the weight and price, see the differences....
http://www.the-digital-picture.com/Reviews/ISO-12233-Sample-Crops.aspx?Lens=404&Camera=453&Sample=0&FLI=0&API=2&LensComp=103&CameraComp=453&SampleComp=0&FLIComp=0&APIComp=3
|
|
|
|
 |
|