[hojolly]

本人有17-55 f/2.8 & 70-200 f/2.8 IS, 現想買多支天涯鏡 (因2支lens出街太煩), 不知 Canon 24-105mm f/4 L 是否好選擇 for 50D

請各位指教 =)

[coastal42]

點解奇怪呢?
我都係用緊50D+24-105

[hojolly]

會唔會 waste左支鏡....不是FF機?? =)

[Ison]

<<<<50D 用 Canon 24-105mm f/4 L 會不會很奇怪??>>>>

會好奇怪師兄點解咁問....................可唔可以解釋下?

[onjo3]

24-105 on 50d no more 天涯鏡
wide angle is cut
or if u give up wide angle, it can be ur 天涯鏡
otherwise
15-85, 18-135 or 18-200 is better

[heeae]

24-105 唔係差, 佢重可以在上FF 時用得返
但係佢在APS-C 就 ........ 差左d lo

[kenanet]

do u feel 奇怪 50D use 70-200 f/2.8 IS ?? coz it should be the same EF lens on Aps-C ............

[bye2]

真係... 有幾奇怪呢....

如果闊D range, 又想有L 字, 又想只帶一支,又想輕便, 得 24-105 呢個選擇吧...
唔影 ultra wide, 基本上夠哂用...

不過... 如果揀天涯鏡去 cover 你家陣個 range... 唔用 18-200 呢D 反而我覺得浪費左部 50D....

[10099644]

除左冇wide 之外有幾怪?

[Ison]

重有24-105依個range 前有10-22 依支鏡, 後有100-400. 有乜咁奇怪?

<<<<<會唔會 waste左支鏡....不是FF機?? =) >>>>

買左唔用先= waste......

[heeae]

咁咪唔合 天涯鏡的要求 = =

[rankinelo]

24-105L is excellent in APS-C gears

most of the disadvantages of this lens (e.g. CA, distortion, dark falloff) are very serious @ the corners / edges, while the center (at least @ 50mm to 70mm range) is excellent and can get close with that in 24-70...

hence APS-C gears hides most of the defects of this lens, with just no wide angle. If CHing doesn't care about the wide angle, this lens is a perfect match

[snoopybee]

每一個人買野都有佢個原因, 而你已經知道自己點解要呢支鏡, 奇就奇在你點解買野要問一些三唔識七的人比意見. =p

[coastal42]

最waste係買左支鏡影唔到滿意o既相...

[homankop]

no,i use 450d +24-105
24-105 is very useful for me