[Kimwon]

小妹係新手, 用緊500D, 宜家想買 支 廣角變焦鏡頭, 考慮緊買 17-40mm F4.0L or 10-22mm F3.5-4.5 (因為見佢地價錢唔相差得太遠)

想請教各位用家有咩意見比小妹

謝謝 ^^

[ive995]

17-40MM 用落500D到應該會變咗做標準鏡喎.....

[Kimwon]

如果用17-40MM 會變咗做標準鏡? 請問點解既? 小妹唔係好明, 請指教^^

[ive995]

如果10-22MM嗰支唯一唔抵就係咁既價錢買支EF-S鏡啫。不過我都諗住買...另外有支好似都幾好，不過副廠鏡，
Tokina AT-X 116 PRO DX AF 11-16mm f/2.8

[free_lu]

17mm x 1.6=28mm
10mm x 1.6=16mm
500D係APS-C機,
焦距要乘番1.6~
明白嗎?

[alexis-sky]

因為500d係 aps-c 機所以焦距
17 x 1.6 = 27.2
40 x 1.6 = 64
27.2 到可以算係廣角鏡

17-40 有人覺得唔夠Wide,10-22 超廣角鏡 + 廣角鏡

因為兩支鏡價錢比較接近,我會選擇17-40 因為係恆定圈及L鏡

[talestar]

17-40 L 防水防塵但唔係超廣角鏡
10-22 唔可以用係FF機 如果你諗住一路用500D 咁
當然係簡10-22 La

[vdo]

I can tell u the PQ of 10-22 is better than 17-40.

[Kimwon]

To: ive995

我都有同感, 而且亦唔明點解佢價錢要成 5xxx, 呢支我都有睇, 我見都有多人advice, 不過唔知咩價$$呢

[ive995]

Tokina AT-X 116 PRO DX AF 11-16mm f/2.8
聽人講就話3800左右，不過我無去問過，但應該唔會差太遠掛...

[sl132]

不過 canon mount 很難找得到!

[mluk06]

其實都要知到您用粳乜野鏡頭先至可以俾多旳見議您.

例如您用開 Kit 18-55, , 會見議您買10-22 lor 囉 ! 但成象, 17-40 L 鏡會好旳!

[Kimwon]

我用緊既kit 係18-55

[will爸爸]

500D 必定推薦 Canon 10-22 , 師妹妳會感受到乜野叫做 Ultra Wide....同17-40既wide差好遠好遠, 影風景必定係 10-22 for 500D

[ACanonGuy]

If 超廣角 is the motivation, EF-S 10-22mm is the only game in town (from Canon) for APS-C body. It gives you 107°30' (10mm) – 63°30' (22mm) angle of view on your 500D. At 10mm 107°30' is 超廣角 by definition.

As for 17-40mm, it gives you 65°54' (17mm) –36°13' (40mm) angle of view on your 500D. It is more like a 標準鏡 as others mentioned.

So if you are looking for 超廣角 and don't mind paying 5xxx for a EF-S lens, that seems to be what you are looking for.