[bmsmaster]

小白大光圈, 大白焦距遠, 普通喜歡攝影的人, 應該買那支好, 請各師兄給點意見

[gwu1]

個人認為２００mm唔夠長，４００mm正好多。

[JSmith]

兩支用途完全唔同，冇得比較﹗
所以兩支都要買﹗

[bmsmaster]

兩支用途完全唔同，冇得比較﹗
所以兩支都要買﹗

想我死?

[JSmith]

幫你超渡咋，可以早登極樂呀~CHing

[bmsmaster]

我真係好想做決定, 幫下手啦, 如果有錢, 我會買多支300/2.8

[Canon Ball]

I'm totally agree with all Ching, if you have the money then buy both.
If not, I'll buy 70-200 IS first. Super shape L Len with great quality material.

[bmsmaster]

Thanks Canon Ball C Hing

[Hikerfoon]

Of course to buy 小白 first. I just bought one at Citicall yesterday HK$13000 cash.

Tested a few pictures today, definitely worth the money. It is a bit heavy but if you take out the frame ring, it is ok.

[JSmith]

我係買左大白先，一年後先至買小白

[bmsmaster]

我都在4:40pm買左小白, 相對以前sigma 50-500比, 好有失落感, 因為遠野影唔到, 近野差唔多, 唯一好嘅係輕好多

另外, 亦體會到non is的缺點, 不用安全快門, D相真係嚇死人, 而且, 要距離好遠先影到, 總之, 好懷念放左出去支SIGMA

今天, 知道SIGMA有支120-300MM F2.8, 唔知有無C HING用過, 幾錢, 看報告好像很好呢!

[fish30d]

Just a thought, what about 70-200 f2.8 + 300 F4L + 1.4x?

I think the image quality of 300F4L is better than 100-400. With 1.4x, you get 420mm.

Also, the 1.4 x can be used on 70-200, making the range to 98mm-280mm. The 2 combined will give you 98mm-420mm, almost the same as 100-400 but much better picture quality!

[JSmith]

加咗1.4x，質素下降，會同大白一樣質素？好懷疑....
如果係咁好，啲長炮重邊度會有人買

[bmsmaster]

但看用家報告小白加1.4和2倍的效果是不錯的, 而且大白光圈細D

300MM我都好想買, 開始時還以為 C HING叫我買300 F2.8------我無錢呀

[JSmith]

效果不錯=/=質素可以同一支長炮比較
如果呢啲extender質素太差，又搵邊個會買？
我買咗支2x extender，根本極少用，只係以防不時之需。