[roxas]

用左枝18-55kit鏡一排
不過覺得55mm就唔係好夠
所以打算搵枝長焦d既....
仲有又覺得唔夠利tim

咁搵左3枝出黎之後,
又唔知揀邊枝好wo
咁多位帥兄可唔可俾d意見...


Canon EF-S 15-85mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM
Canon EF-S 17-85mm f4-5.6 IS USM
Sigma 17-70mm F2.8-4 DC MACRO OS HSM

[skydogs]

Sigma 17-70mm F2.8-4 DC MACRO OS HSM 低玩.

[roxas]

咁li枝除左平之外
仲有d咩係好過個2枝既?

[新手之手]

Sigma 17-70 未用過唔知..........

但如果15-85 同17-85 比較, 諗都唔駛諗.....一定係15-85 好, 17-85 唔平, 而且質素非常一般, 15-85 係一支高質鏡, 而且相對焦距有24mm, 日常用唔駛擔心唔夠wide, 除非勁喜歡"超廣角", 否則15-85 夠用~~~~~

[roxas]

不過17-85同15-85
2枝差2千銀...
個質素分別值唔值li2千銀??

[新手之手]

如果揀17-85 小弟覺得不如用番支18-55 好過..........

[叮噹仔]

個分別超過2000蚊好多~~
包括造功, 成色,
15-85支野都叫幾SHARP,
質感都唔錯,

不過TELE 位唔算好強,
55同85既分別, 差唔多好多, 行前2,3步都係度,

如果唔懶, 可以諗下支平平地既55-250~
SHARP就一係C17-55(雖然好好,不過幾貴)
一係就向定焦出發~

[roxas]

乜17-85真係差到咁既咩??
差係d咩地方?

咁如果我除去17-85
就只係canon15-85同sigma17-70去比
邊枝值得去買多d?
實質我除左係想zoom遠d, 仲有就係想利d咁....

[Obi-Wan]

roxas

I have the following EFS lenses 10-22, 18-55(non IS & IS), 17-85IS, 15-85IS, 18-200IS, 55-250IS

sharpest one is 15-85 <=== best buy

the 17-85 suffer a very serious problem below 24mm ---- heavy chromatic aberration. After 24mm, the lens is quite ok

the 18-55 non IS is the weakest one
the 18-55IS is slightly better, but no any better than 17-85IS after 24mm

if u have 18-55IS, u can consider the cheap cheap 55-250IS which is quite sharp for this price ($1200 2nd hand)

[roxas]

咁17-85值唔值得買...

我係應該買枝15-85好...
定係17-85 + 55-250好??

[飛哥仔]

咁17-85值唔值得買...
========================
距個價唔平, 如果真係唔怕麻煩, 既買支55-250仲好, 新既55-250都比15-85平一倍有多....17-85唔長得18-55幾多, 分別唔會好大,

18-55 + 55-250 + 50.8 係窮人三寶. 真係你想玩咩都可以實現到 , 如果你已經有長焦既鏡而想要一支標準鏡既, 咁就平d可以選Sigma 17-70mm F2.8-4 DC MACRO OS HSM ....有米先選15-85

[gwu1]

要質素就efs１５﹣８５mmIS。

[飛哥仔]

補充....距個價唔平 <--- 15-85....17-85真係麻麻...要買就三思..

[roxas]

就係15-85...
雖然知li枝係最好既~不過真係好似貴左d...
一枝鏡就可以買2枝鏡...
所以我先諗得咁痛苦/.\

仲有其實55-250我遲早都會買既~
不過e家就係諗枝代替左18-55既...

C17-85同S17-70
li2枝邊枝質素好d?

[k_f]

我同樓主你一樣~
最後入左15-85
so far so good
值得買~