[iesm8571]

大家好! 小弟最近想嘗試接觸單反相機,心目中想買550D,但係對於鏡頭方面有好多問題想請教一下,
首先就係買機果陣買唔買埋佢果支KIT鏡18mm~55mm/18mm~135mm,因為我買機都係想用來影下風景或者係影下d街景同建築物之類為主,咁我應該揀咩鏡好?因為係第一次用單反,所以想買住一支鏡習慣下同練習一下技術先,所以想買支平得來又好少少的鏡,我係網上睇到有支Sigma 17-50mm F2.8 EX DC OS HSM同Sigma 18-50mm F2.8 EX DC MACRO HSM,還有Tamron SP AF17-50mm F/2.8 XR Di II LD Aspherical [IF] (A16)
想問下以上3支邊一支會好d?用來影我講果類既相好唔好?同埋3支既分別大唔大?呢兩間公司邊一個出既鏡頭會好d?,因為我聽人講話sigma d鏡好多時都會走焦?..
最後就係呢3支鏡同埋果兩支kit鏡,我應該買邊一支比較合適?...麻煩幫幫忙

[rankinelo]

iesm8571 CHing,

說真的, 單反沒有一步到位... 如果你都唔知自己要乜, 咁都係550D + 15-85先啦... 到知自己要乜先再買上去都未遲... 這個combination最易用, 又會初學者... 不過都係那一句...

最好係自己去showroom試... 又免費... 係forum問100個人都唔及自己一試真...

Canon Showroom:
香港九龍尖沙咀彌敦道26號10樓

[Obi-Wan]

iesm8571
just buy 550D+18-55IS kit, buy 50/1.8 + 55-250IS basically suitable for various uses
if u have more $, 550D+15-85 kit plus 70-200/f4 IS + 50/1.4 is the perfect combination

[新手之手]

iesm8571 ching,

rankinelo ching同埋 Obi-Wan ching 都講得非常啱..........
我正正就係用緊15-85 + 70-200 /f4 IS + Sigma 50.4, 非常非常啱用(夠用), 而且成像絕對唔差, 其實就好似Obi-Wan ching 講 "升呢"版窮人三寶咁(18-55 + 55-250 + 50.8), 不過更好用, 因為支15-85 夠wide, 除非係勁喜歡超廣角風景, 否則夠晒用, 唔駛再嘥$$ 出支10-22..........

不過如果你唔諗住投放太多$$ 的話, 18-55 + 55-250 + 50.8 可能比較啱預算, 因為啱啱踏入單反嘅世界, 應該仲要預留啲$$ 買其他配件 & 器材........
好似......相機袋....腳架....Hood.....濾鏡....閃燈....清潔用品...防潮箱.......
(當然唔係叫你一定買晒, 不過少數怕長計, 其他配件加加埋埋都唔平~~~~~)

[maokee]

I have 550D with kit lens 18-55mm and my friend gave me a EFS 18-200mm but the colour wasn't good. I am thinking to get 17-40mm 4L for normal use. Any comment for that lens with 550D???

[iesm8571]

咁即係我買住果支18-55就ok？因為我下個月會去台灣旅行，買呢kit鏡係唔係對新手來講都ok？仲想問下各位講果支15-85mm係邊一支？大約幾多錢？仲有就係大家多數去邊到買鏡？因為我見d大行好似偏貴

[rankinelo]

>>咁即係我買住果支18-55就ok？
最好係自己去showroom試... 又免費... 係forum問100個人都唔及自己一試真...

>>仲想問下各位講果支15-85mm係邊一支？
http://www.dcfever.com/lens/specification.php?id=482
PS... Is it so difficult to search even in this website???

[wmh714]

15-85 二手價約4xxx-5xxx,新鏡應該六千幾

[hunter21]

剛剛玩,18-55都好夠用了,用落知道自己需要d乜先換會好d.

[Obi-Wan]

maokee

17-40mm 4L on APS-C CANON may not be the best choice
I have this lens for over 5 years, only seldom use with APS-C canon, only recent 2 years use it with 5D2.

BUT if u want to get an L lens in order to "enhance your confidence", it is no harm to buy this lens as an investment.

I bought 17-40/4L @ $43xx many years ago, now the 2nd hand price of this L lens is above $4500

If u want to have better quality in APS-C, u can consider 15-85IS or 17-55/2.8IS. Both are "king" of APS-C Canon, quality that can match L lens. (but they are not weather sealed, so can get dust inside more quickly than most L lenses)

[maokee]

Many thx!!! Obi-Wan

[maokee]

Obi-Wan:

I know 15-85 IS or 17-55/2.8 IS both are good lens but I do feel that they both over price! I do worry about the dust will get inside more easily. There are two reasons I consider 17-40mm 4L 1. The colour 2. Water and dust proof. I would rather buy Tamron B005 than 17-55/2.8 IS because is much cheaper. I guss the picture quality shouldn't be too bad for Tamron B005.

[Obi-Wan]

see see
http://www.the-digital-picture.com/Reviews/ISO-12233-Sample-Crops.aspx?CameraComp=0&FLIComp=0&APIComp=0&Lens=679&Camera=474&Sample=0&FLI=0&API=0&LensComp=398

[rankinelo]

maokee CHing,

>>I do feel that they both over price!
This is subjective. I think that 15-85 is worth when it is sold as kit for 550D

>>dust will get inside more easily
Dust is all over the world, and it won't affect the image. It just affect your heart feeling

>>two reasons I consider 17-40mm 4L 1. The colour 2. Water and dust proof.
I do think that 17-55 2.8 does a much better job than 17-40. Again, personal feelings only.

>>I would rather buy Tamron B005 than 17-55/2.8 IS because is much cheaper
I never tried that, but the color and brokeh of Tamron... I have no confidence on that.

Again, one final word...
最好係自己去showroom試... 又免費... 係forum問100個人都唔及自己一試...