[Cashting]

500D 配 Sigma 24-70mm F2.8 IF EX DG HSM

定

500D 配 2470L 好?

[wllui]

如果你咁有米, 兩枝都唔好, 換左部機身至講

[Zawa]

有錢緊係換左鏡先LA~
俾得起都係C記好

[火Ken]

金錢許可下揀原廠Canon 24-70L，如果入SIGMA果支，入二手無咁蝕！質數前者真係不錯，後者我朋友質數不錯，Canon 24-70L會高點！但如果買二手SIGMA 24-70 要留意一二代價錢不一，小心選購！！

[wllui]

Both lens will play vvv good on APSC bodies anyway. I don't think anyone can see the difference of their outputs by using same 500d.
Which one is better? Huh? I thought there is no need to ask gwa. Just that the PQ is limited by 500D. Body

[Zawa]

thats silly, can u distinguish the difference between the output of 500D and 7D, i really doubt that if u say yes
the biggest difference between sigma and canon is the IQ at 2.8, if u r an experienced shooter, u would know what i mean
of coz the built quality etc is different as well, thats why there's a price difference
its just compromise, easy enough

[Zawa]

in addition, u need to look at the some other characteristics when choosing a lens, such as flaw, distortion, bokeh quality, light falloff (especially full frame)
hv a look at "http://www.photozone.de/" to find out the performance of both lenses

[wllui]

7d? 我幾時提及過7d? if you are an experienced shooter, you know why the site would separate tests for APS-C and FF. You will not get much improvement from SWIS to SWIS2 if you are still using APSC bodies.

2470, 原廠副廠邊支好.. 仲駛問? 如果乜都可以唔睇價錢, 當然係支2470L啦, 原廠只有一個壞處, 就係貴之嘛, 我意思只係想講, 兩枝插在500d上, 影出來真係好難分別係邊支, 影出來可能唔夠sharp的原因係個對焦系統上, 本身的問題係benz和法拉利engine放在corolla上, 你問我benz定法拉利好?

我唔係話500d唔好,我都用過, 但你要佢配上頂級鏡, 無疑係不能發揮全力, 或許日後放便升級買原廠, 點都好, zawa師兄, 睇番樓主原本的問題, 係500d配邊支, 問兩支配在500d上的比較. 我親身試過2470L配上500d, 才下呢個結論, 不是憑空講白話

[dickchen]

2470L畢竟是菲林機時代的鏡, 用在DSLR上未盡完美. Sigma 的新2470用在500D上可能會發揮得更好.

[wllui]

都有可能
菲林機都係FF, 24-70L對FF作出優化，唔出奇
邊緣的解像度會有分別，但crop 左1.6實力拉近番
兩技都咁好，如果冇唸住再upgrade, sigma 夠用，錢不是問題就唔使多講，更加冇野講

[Zawa]

你下左咩結論? 你答左咩問題? 樓主問邊支鏡好你就叫人換機, 好似係你無睇題目喎~
SHARP唔SHARP唔係對焦問題咁簡單, 唔信你就試下MF比較下就知LA, 特別係大光圈個陣~
仲有我都講過"u need to look at the some other characteristics when choosing a lens, such as flaw, distortion, bokeh quality, light falloff (especially full frame)"
定係你唔知揀鏡要睇呢D?
你既然話用係500D度睇唔出, 咁買支TAMRON 28-75 2.8就得LA, 又平

[wllui]

哈哈... 有D火喎
你有你道理GE... MTF圖或其他標準顯示兩支都係高標準
不過一大堆理論, 不如親自試一下...
"SHARP唔SHARP唔係對焦問題咁簡單", 咁當然啦, 但樓主想UPGRADE器材, 可惜個樽頸位的確會係對焦能力果度, 用過才會明, 未親身感受過的人, 係未必會有咁的考慮, 用緊中級或更高級機未知民間苦況, 當然假若下下可以LIVEVIEW X 10 + MF都解決到問題GE...

無謂開罵戰啦... 我明師兄你想講咩. 依你方法, 最終答案必然係原廠
攝影好個人, 好SUBJECTIVE, 有人要色水, 有人要RESOLUTION, 有人信坊間的TEST, 始終係要BALANCE好多野, 例如用副廠鏡, 剩餘的錢換上7D 或 5D, 學你話齋, 換部5D2配28-75 2.8, 比500D配2470L邊樣好D呢?

結論/我之前寫左D乜, 自己番睇吧. 你咁當我唔知揀鏡要睇呢D算吧, 我只係針對性講呢D鏡放係500D上會係點, 大家講的東西都唔同, 冇乜好拗

[wllui]

你就當我唔知揀鏡要睇呢D算吧

[火Ken]

Tamron 28-75mm 都係一支不錯的選擇！！我澳門有朋友都經濟d係香港入D二手5D1加Tamron A09，d色都不差，滿意加Good嫁！！

[wllui]

Agree with Ken