上個主題 :: 下個主題 |
作者 |
訊息 |
Deepsea88
註冊: 2010-06-03
上載我的肖像
|
which PQ is better..70-200 2.8L IS II + 2X or 100-400L or .. Post time: 7 月 13 日 |
|
|
Which combination offer better PQ in a normal day light situation?
70-200 2.8IS II + 2X Extender
100-400L
384+1.4X
I will use it for wildlife shooting in Kenya this summer but seems a zoom lens is more flexible.
|
|
|
|
 |
wesleyyau
註冊: 2009-03-25
上載我的肖像
|
Re: which PQ is better..70-200 2.8L IS II + 2X or 100-400L or .. Post time: 7 月 13 日 |
|
|
I've the items you mentioned.
100-400L is more suitable in this case.
|
|
|
|
 |
kenny.k
註冊: 2007-07-25
上載我的肖像
|
Re: which PQ is better..70-200 2.8L IS II + 2X or 100-400L or .. Post time: 7 月 14 日 |
|
|
我建議100-400L
70-200L II + 2x 對蕉慢左好多, 而且唔利...
一係學我 70-200L II + 1.4 再drop相~
|
|
|
|
 |
Deepsea88
註冊: 2010-06-03
上載我的肖像
|
Re: which PQ is better..70-200 2.8L IS II + 2X or 100-400L or .. Post time: 7 月 15 日 |
|
|
i tried the three combination tonight in Canon showroom....and viewed those photos taken by the three combinations in a 27" monitor.
May be i am not too good in telling which is better...i can't see much difference among them... :(
Relatively the color is less saturated by 70-200L IS II + 2X vs others.
Indeed I have 70-200L IS II + 2X already....and still think for the 100-400L because its range is good and convenient but i don't like its design and it has only 2 stop IS.
|
|
|
|
 |
Obi-Wan
註冊: 2006-02-06
上載我的肖像
|
Re: which PQ is better..70-200 2.8L IS II + 2X or 100-400L or .. Post time: 7 月 15 日 |
|
|
I don't have new 70-200L/IS II
but for picture quality @400mm (or 420mm), my copies
100-400L (f4) > 384+1.4X (f5.6) > 70-200/2.8IS + 2X (f5.6)
|
|
|
|
 |
h0001244
註冊: 2007-04-19
上載我的肖像
|
Re: which PQ is better..70-200 2.8L IS II + 2X or 100-400L or .. Post time: 7 月 15 日 |
|
|
With the bright sunlight at Kenya, 2 stops IS is more than enough
more over 100-400 has flexible range that you need for wild animals
by the way, don't use shutter speed less than 1/100, the animals move.
Don't think that you can use 70-200 and take best 200mm photo of an elephant and then you dismantle the lens and add a 2X and zoom it too 400mm for a dik-dik, they will run and wouldn't wait for you.
Moreover, it's very dusty there, changing lens would just let the dust gets into your lenses and camera.
|
|
|
|
 |
Deepsea88
註冊: 2010-06-03
上載我的肖像
|
Re: which PQ is better..70-200 2.8L IS II + 2X or 100-400L or .. Post time: 7 月 15 日 |
|
|
tks for the advice!
i think my combination for the tour will be :
5D2 + 70-200
and
7D + 100-400
will also bring two more wide lens.
|
|
|
|
 |
kenny.k
註冊: 2007-07-25
上載我的肖像
|
Re: which PQ is better..70-200 2.8L IS II + 2X or 100-400L or .. Post time: 7 月 15 日 |
|
|
Deepsea88 兄 你就好啦~2 SET...我都努力緊好似你咁...
但可能已經係 5D3 AND 7D後續機..
|
|
|
|
 |
h0001244
註冊: 2007-04-19
上載我的肖像
|
Re: which PQ is better..70-200 2.8L IS II + 2X or 100-400L or .. Post time: 7 月 15 日 |
|
|
Deepsea88 Ching,
Your combination 5D2 + 70-200 and 7D + 100-400 is perfect for the kenya trip
by the way, are you Ralph?
|
|
|
|
 |
airhang
註冊: 2004-06-28
上載我的肖像
|
Re: which PQ is better..70-200 2.8L IS II + 2X or 100-400L or .. Post time: 7 月 15 日 |
|
|
I will go to Kenya this summer too, but I have got only 5D2 and 100-400, is it enough? And should I use tripod or mono in the van?
|
|
|
|
 |
h0001244
註冊: 2007-04-19
上載我的肖像
|
Re: which PQ is better..70-200 2.8L IS II + 2X or 100-400L or .. Post time: 7 月 15 日 |
|
|
400mm is not quite enough for me (my own opinion)
but 5D2 can crop good photos
tripod is nearly useless for the trip, no place for you to extend it on safari van
monopod should be at least 1.7m, you will know when you are there
there4 pros suggested to use sandbag, put it on the roof edge of the van
a small tripod is good group photos when you are allowed to get off the van in some restricted areas.
|
|
|
|
 |
h0001244
註冊: 2007-04-19
上載我的肖像
|
Re: which PQ is better..70-200 2.8L IS II + 2X or 100-400L or .. Post time: 7 月 15 日 |
|
|
pm me and leave your facebook account to me if you want to know more
|
|
|
|
 |
tonychiu68
註冊: 2009-11-19
上載我的肖像
|
Re: which PQ is better..70-200 2.8L IS II + 2X or 100-400L or .. Post time: 7 月 15 日 |
|
|
http://www.dchome.net/viewthread.php?tid=578523
|
|
|
|
 |
tonychiu68
註冊: 2009-11-19
上載我的肖像
|
Re: which PQ is better..70-200 2.8L IS II + 2X or 100-400L or .. Post time: 7 月 15 日 |
|
|
但係我諗大白應該好過384 + 1.4x!!!!!!
|
|
|
|
 |
lsammy
註冊: 2003-10-31
上載我的肖像
|
Re: which PQ is better..70-200 2.8L IS II + 2X or 100-400L or .. Post time: 7 月 16 日 |
|
|
70-200 2.8L IS II
我沒有
剛測完
384+1.4第一代
真的比大白
利十色鮮十iS
全剖都比大白強少少
沒有轉錯
|
|
|
|
 |
|