8 月 13 日 (星期三) | 會員登記|會員中心
Canon 單反討論區
Post new topic   Reply to topic  到最上層  |  回到主題  |  搜尋 
頁數: 1 2共 15 回應
上個主題 :: 下個主題  
作者 訊息

Deepsea88




註冊: 2010-06-03

上載我的肖像
題目which PQ is better..70-200 2.8L IS II + 2X or 100-400L or ..     Post time: 7 月 13 日

Which combination offer better PQ in a normal day light situation?

70-200 2.8IS II + 2X Extender

100-400L

384+1.4X

I will use it for wildlife shooting in Kenya this summer but seems a zoom lens is more flexible.
Back to top

wesleyyau




註冊: 2009-03-25

上載我的肖像
題目Re: which PQ is better..70-200 2.8L IS II + 2X or 100-400L or ..     Post time: 7 月 13 日

I've the items you mentioned.
100-400L is more suitable in this case.
觀看用戶檔案 回覆 Back to top

kenny.k




註冊: 2007-07-25

上載我的肖像
題目Re: which PQ is better..70-200 2.8L IS II + 2X or 100-400L or ..     Post time: 7 月 14 日

我建議100-400L

70-200L II + 2x 對蕉慢左好多, 而且唔利...

一係學我 70-200L II + 1.4 再drop相~
觀看用戶檔案 回覆 Back to top

Deepsea88




註冊: 2010-06-03

上載我的肖像
題目Re: which PQ is better..70-200 2.8L IS II + 2X or 100-400L or ..     Post time: 7 月 15 日

i tried the three combination tonight in Canon showroom....and viewed those photos taken by the three combinations in a 27" monitor.

May be i am not too good in telling which is better...i can't see much difference among them... :(

Relatively the color is less saturated by 70-200L IS II + 2X vs others.

Indeed I have 70-200L IS II + 2X already....and still think for the 100-400L because its range is good and convenient but i don't like its design and it has only 2 stop IS.
觀看用戶檔案 回覆 Back to top

Obi-Wan




註冊: 2006-02-06

上載我的肖像
題目Re: which PQ is better..70-200 2.8L IS II + 2X or 100-400L or ..     Post time: 7 月 15 日

I don't have new 70-200L/IS II

but for picture quality @400mm (or 420mm), my copies
100-400L (f4) > 384+1.4X (f5.6) > 70-200/2.8IS + 2X (f5.6)
觀看用戶檔案 回覆 Back to top

h0001244




註冊: 2007-04-19

上載我的肖像
題目Re: which PQ is better..70-200 2.8L IS II + 2X or 100-400L or ..     Post time: 7 月 15 日

With the bright sunlight at Kenya, 2 stops IS is more than enough
more over 100-400 has flexible range that you need for wild animals
by the way, don't use shutter speed less than 1/100, the animals move.

Don't think that you can use 70-200 and take best 200mm photo of an elephant and then you dismantle the lens and add a 2X and zoom it too 400mm for a dik-dik, they will run and wouldn't wait for you.

Moreover, it's very dusty there, changing lens would just let the dust gets into your lenses and camera.
觀看用戶檔案 回覆 Back to top

Deepsea88




註冊: 2010-06-03

上載我的肖像
題目Re: which PQ is better..70-200 2.8L IS II + 2X or 100-400L or ..     Post time: 7 月 15 日

tks for the advice!

i think my combination for the tour will be :

5D2 + 70-200
and
7D + 100-400

will also bring two more wide lens.
觀看用戶檔案 回覆 Back to top

kenny.k




註冊: 2007-07-25

上載我的肖像
題目Re: which PQ is better..70-200 2.8L IS II + 2X or 100-400L or ..     Post time: 7 月 15 日

Deepsea88 兄 你就好啦~2 SET...我都努力緊好似你咁...

但可能已經係 5D3 AND 7D後續機..
觀看用戶檔案 回覆 Back to top

h0001244




註冊: 2007-04-19

上載我的肖像
題目Re: which PQ is better..70-200 2.8L IS II + 2X or 100-400L or ..     Post time: 7 月 15 日

Deepsea88 Ching,

Your combination 5D2 + 70-200 and 7D + 100-400 is perfect for the kenya trip

by the way, are you Ralph?
觀看用戶檔案 回覆 Back to top

airhang




註冊: 2004-06-28

上載我的肖像
題目Re: which PQ is better..70-200 2.8L IS II + 2X or 100-400L or ..     Post time: 7 月 15 日

I will go to Kenya this summer too, but I have got only 5D2 and 100-400, is it enough? And should I use tripod or mono in the van?
觀看用戶檔案 回覆 Back to top

h0001244




註冊: 2007-04-19

上載我的肖像
題目Re: which PQ is better..70-200 2.8L IS II + 2X or 100-400L or ..     Post time: 7 月 15 日

400mm is not quite enough for me (my own opinion)
but 5D2 can crop good photos

tripod is nearly useless for the trip, no place for you to extend it on safari van
monopod should be at least 1.7m, you will know when you are there
there4 pros suggested to use sandbag, put it on the roof edge of the van

a small tripod is good group photos when you are allowed to get off the van in some restricted areas.
觀看用戶檔案 回覆 Back to top

h0001244




註冊: 2007-04-19

上載我的肖像
題目Re: which PQ is better..70-200 2.8L IS II + 2X or 100-400L or ..     Post time: 7 月 15 日

pm me and leave your facebook account to me if you want to know more
觀看用戶檔案 回覆 Back to top

tonychiu68




註冊: 2009-11-19

上載我的肖像
題目Re: which PQ is better..70-200 2.8L IS II + 2X or 100-400L or ..     Post time: 7 月 15 日

http://www.dchome.net/viewthread.php?tid=578523
觀看用戶檔案 回覆 Back to top

tonychiu68




註冊: 2009-11-19

上載我的肖像
題目Re: which PQ is better..70-200 2.8L IS II + 2X or 100-400L or ..     Post time: 7 月 15 日

但係我諗大白應該好過384 + 1.4x!!!!!!
觀看用戶檔案 回覆 Back to top

lsammy




註冊: 2003-10-31

上載我的肖像
題目Re: which PQ is better..70-200 2.8L IS II + 2X or 100-400L or ..     Post time: 7 月 16 日

70-200 2.8L IS II
我沒有


剛測完
384+1.4第一代

真的比大白

利十色鮮十iS

全剖都比大白強少少

沒有轉錯
觀看用戶檔案 回覆 Back to top
 
頁數: 1 2共 15 回應
Post new topic   Reply to topic  到最上層  |  回到主題  |  搜尋 



 討論區列表  |  Need a Login? Register Here 
 User Login
 User Name:
 Password: