[icelemon]

I have a D80 and have the 16-85 VR lens already

should I buy the above lens?

Please give some comment.

Thanks

[eedbt]

no

[icelemon]

i heard it is a fast lens... and superb in low light....

but i already have the focus length covered......

selling @ 4500 in MK

why the answer is no?

PS: I have no F2.8 lens

[salonsip2005]

你有支原廠就唔好買呢支LA~ 又唔係SWM 摩打, 快得去邊呀~
一係你放左你依家呢支先買佢~ OR 你錢多過頭就無所謂LA~
如果唔係都幾無謂

[icelemon]

其實用4500 買個 F0.7 大家覺得值唔值呢?

16-85VR BASICALLY 所有方面都比17-50VC 好好多EXCEPT F2.8

係唔係呀?

[eedbt]

參考這裡

隔離飯香 d 咩 ?

[maskli]

買支A16無咁嬲

[ed_ca]

買支A16無咁嬲 x2

that range no need VC/VR

[doraemonkw]

Ching, 不如你放左支16-85VR, 入支17-55/2.8 好過啦.
17-55/2.8 Dx鏡皇, 二手都係7500左右.

[icelemon]

1500 not 7500 right?

but the range of 16-85 is very useful and nikon VR is very good..

very hard decsion tim...

pls provide more comment

[ed_ca]

7-55/2.8 Dx鏡皇, 二手都係7500左右 <--- is correct, 7500 not 1500.

Just found this link for the B005:

http://dc.watch.impress.co.jp/docs/review/date_lens/20090917_315883.html

[SLAMPAN]

標題系 Tamron AR17-50 F2.8 VC 唔系 17-55/2.8 Dx鏡皇

[hanny]

Tamron AR17-50 F2.8 VC

this lens is good

and the focuing sound is silent than a016 a lot
a little bit faster than a016

depend on this price is better than the nikon 17~55 f2.8dx

price is ok

because the a16 is too nosie sound when focuing

[tkoalbert]

我又問?貫了17-50後又買什麼鏡?
我會選擇連續性,買70-300 vr先