[ssannwong]

AF-S NIKKOR 16-35MM F/4G ED VR
呢支好有用, 仲要夠輕, 如果成像係夠靚我諗我一定買
http://www.dpreview.com/news/1002/10020902nikon16mm35mm.asp

specifications
Focal length 16-35mm
Diagonal Angle of view 107° - 60° (83° - 44° for Nikon DX format)

Maximum aperture F 4
Minimum aperture F 22
Lens Construction • 17 elements/12 groups
• 2 ED glass elements
• 3 aspherical elements

Number of diaphragm blades 9 (rounded)
Minimum focus • 0.29m at a focal length of 16- 35mm
• 0.28m at a focal length between 20- 28mm

Filter thread 77mm
Weight 680g (24 oz)
Dimensions 82.5mm diameter x 125mm length

------------
AF-S NIKKOR 24MM F/1.4G ED
AF大光圈定焦廣角鏡回來了
http://www.dpreview.com/news/1002/10020901nikon24mmf14.asp

Specifications:
Focal length 24mm
Diagonal Angle of view 84° (61° with Nikon DX format)

Maximum aperture F1.4
Minimum aperture F 16
Lens Construction • 12 elements/10 groups
• 2 ED glass elements
• 2 aspherical elements

Number of diaphragm blades 9 (rounded)
Minimum focus 0.25 m/0.82 ft

Filter thread 77mm
Weight 620g (21.9oz)
Dimensions 83mm diameter x 88.5mm length

[timlee672]

呢兩日仲諗緊入唔入17-35添,依家等埋AF-S 16-35mm f/4G ED VR先.

[rto77]

有 VR, 金圈, 過硬 10k.....

[Zawa]

咁既SPEC...我諗都唔會平得去邊...

[onlyken]

其實16-35依個RANGE, VR 有點多餘, 反而24-70支鏡皇冇VR.

I guess it may be a bit higher than 12-24 f4, ~$7K -8K la

[onlyken]

原來16-35唔係DX鏡啊, 咁可能要1皮了!

[ed_ca]

AF-S NIKKOR 24MM F/1.4G ED

won't be cheap neither. About double the price of the 50.4G?

[icelemon]

I am a owner of 17-35 f2.8

i defintely won't buy 1635 f4

puting f4 and VR is a dumb combination

i doubt anyone will buy this if already own 1735

[pkpartner]

AF-S NIKKOR 24MM F/1.4G ED
won't be cheap neither. About double the price of the 50.4G?
陋幾次口都未得 起碼過皮 舊底碌28 1.4都皮幾 何況new 24 1.4

I am a owner of 17-35 f2.8
i defintely won't buy 1635 f4
puting f4 and VR is a dumb combination
i doubt anyone will buy this if already own 1735

Totally Agree ~ F4唔算好dumb VR就真係笨實D
而且有17-35 真係無原因再買 未有既就有得諗但係都係睇價錢差千鬆d大一級光圈你點揀?

[terencehonin]

16-35 f/2.8 就有睇頭

f/4 係暗環境, 冇高幾級 ISO 都比較困難, 除非個個用家都有部 D3S 啦

同意加 VR 真係畫蛇添足

[terencehonin]

反而支 24 f/1.4 幾有張力, 大光圈又保持 sharp 畫質, 好味道 ! 但係價錢一定唔會平.

http://imaging.nikon.com/products/imaging/lineup/lens/af/wideangle/af-s_24mmf_14d/index.htm

[ssannwong]

其實我又唔覺VR搵笨, f/4可以降低鏡片造價及整體重量, 而加上VR抵消同F/2.8間的不足, 我覺得相當可取, 新N記FX廣角鏡, 一早唔預佢個價會平, 價格八千以下已經算抵, 八千以上意料之中, 過萬真係要睇睇相先

其實影景反而唔覺f/2.8有用, 通常用5.6至11, 而f/2.8真正有用係影識得動既嘢, 需要提高快門所以需要大光圈, 好似影體育影賽車影小朋友咁

至於支24/1.4, 我都覺得一定會好貴

[lambertnh]

呢支野個外觀同 17-55/2.8 DX 極度接近，唔知鏡片組有冇更新。以前用 17-55 果陣，對佢 Wide End 色散同成像其實唔太滿意..

[ssannwong]

lambertnh ching,

小弟都係咁諗, 呢支16-35/4用特殊鏡片既數目同17-35/2.8一模一樣

[ssannwong]

X的~~ 兩支鏡都係N字嘜, 搶錢既「納米」塗層~~~

支Zoom咁一定過萬la~~