[devilbb]

我想買支, 大家有什麼意見?

[onlyken]

可能因為出左28-300mm

[veryoldcat]

抵買,素質高。

[onlyken]

樓主問"賣" 啊.....不是"買".

[salonsip2005]

唔知呢, 個人認為可能係合成樹脂鏡玩多幾玩D 合成膠會老化,所以D 師兄玩幾年就賣左支鏡佢瓜, 唔知係唔係咁呢? 不過呢支野真係平靚正, 可以當平價小黑用,真係唔錯嫁, 我依家都好鐘意佢呀

[devilbb]

好多人話 200-300 好唔得, 會唔會 Tamron 70-300mm VC 好 d?

[swiftune]

虚榮心作梗

[veryoldcat]

樓主題目是"甘多人賣",但內容是"想買",onlyken-ching看真D!!

[kpjam]

個人認為如果不上全幅機，新的55-300vr性價比更高

[devilbb]

我都諗過55-300，不過都要三千又未有測試…

[kpjam]

小弟亦有留意到二手市埸近来多咗738vr、我想或受新鏡影响，一是想換28-300 或想試吓55-300之新科技鏡頭，其實呢兩支鏡碓是幾有吸引力，全面兼顧各方面用家，令用家多些選擇，看來放鏡之人多會二擇其一，享受新鏡之樂趣。

[win360]

買D7000 kit set 咪跟55-300VR
找其他師兄一起買平D
一個要BODY
一個要55-300VR

[pc168]

Recently bought the Tamron SP 70-300 VC. It really outperforms the Nikon 70-300 VR. While Nikon's 200-300mm resolution is just 'ok' or somewhere below 'ok', Tamron has excellent performance across the whole zoom range even wide open. I'm the kind of people that sometimes not so believe on MTF charts. But the MTF chart we found at Tamron website really reflects the true performance of this lens. In addition, the VC is very effective and I have a feeling that it is even better than Canon's IS (I used Canon gears before).

I think the reason why people buy the Nikon 70-300 vr is because of the brand 'Nikon'. And why so many people selling it is because of the poor performance.

[garyz]

Agree! 我同時有 Nikon 70-300 VR 同 Tamron 70-300VC, Nikon 係200-300段近乎係廢既. 所以一見到各網站大讚Tamron 支VC勁, 立刻去買左一支.... 結果係, 龍仔超晒班.... 200-300 sharp到暈.

[hksar2047]

I have a Nikon 70-300VR day lens as this is not that good if you use it at the evening, by the way how much is the Tamron