[atur300]

想入部NIKON,
D200 定 D90 好??

[cowmohk]

兩部唔同世紀產品，iso 一定係 d90優勝，但冇自動測光，玩手動鏡會麻煩d，但手感同速度就 d200 好。兩者我會揀 d200 ，一來佢係中階機，二手價平，同埋手動鏡影出來d相係幾靚，呢個一定要試。建議你係 $4000以下購入，sc 15000 左右，試埋個CCD有冇死點。呢點係最重要...

[snoopybee]

D200 is for once the state of the art product but I would say D90 wins here.

[Ansonbo]

緊係200d無論色彩和層次都比d90好,為一係no movie同像素/iso較低之外，其它唔錯，上代機皇有返咁上下,如比我選擇一定200d.

[Ansonbo]

Sorry 按錯應是d200

[atur300]

THX !!我知道喇!!

[salonsip2005]

D90 色已經差好遠

[atur300]

d90色差好遠,即係d90差D?

[ssannwong]

諗得D200, 不如考慮下Fujifilm S5 PRO, 像數係細d, 但顏色真係好正

[salonsip2005]

HAHAH 我意思係d90 色比d200 好, 仲有得自已set 添 iso 又勁d 呀

[飯窯]

諗d200不如等d7000出街之後諗d300好過

[fwan67]

Of course I'll think about D90. D200 is using Generation 1 technology and D90 is Generation 2. The image process is totally a generation gap upgraded.

So, for me I'll consider D90. If D200, then why not consider D2x or even D1x if you like old digital camera. You should know the image of D1x is just similar to D40 now a day. So worth to invest those old DSLR ?

:-D

[guava]

D200 is much cheaper!

[lamlam21775353]

Fujifilm S5 Pro 係咪可以 用哂 nikon 所有配件?
燈、nx2、....

[F4sfever]

200d無論色彩和層次都比d90好, no movie同像素/iso較低之外，其它唔錯
顏色好正 ,Must +MB D200, Around 4500-4900.is acceptable !