[HC715]

請教各位前輩 :-
(1)買D300定係D700好？
聽朋友講全幅機係未來大方向，買D700可以用耐啲至換機、

(2)D700(行貨)邊間最平？
我問過以下三間 :-
豐X - $18000 (可做分期)
直X廣場 - $17950 (冇分期)
鐳X - $20800 (可做分期)
唔知仲有冇其他再平啲？
因為我都想買埋直度，如果包埋直度，貴少少都OK !

(3)D700嘅直度如果單買幾多錢？

(4)D700配邊一支Nikon中段Zoom鏡較好？
我知 24-70/2.8 最好，但太貴，唔想而家買，好傷！
豐X介紹 VR 24-120 3.5 - 5.6 IF-ED
朋友推介24-85 / 2.8 - 4D IF
兩支的價錢都好似差不多(四千樓下)。

煩請各前輩賜教，謝謝！

[snoopybee]

我同你一樣決定唔到, 對我來講最大原因係 FF justify 唔到我比多 $7000 出來, 同埋呢個時勢 ...

不過我見你仲有好多唔清晰的地方. 見意你再做多些 research, 起碼自己識答到 1, 3, 4. 我估你會比現在更知你想要咩.

我要答你, 其實好易答到, 不過當你認真想通想透以上問題, 你先會知邊部你自己.

[kowlboy]

how about:
new D300 + 2nd hand 17-55 F2.8 = arround $17500 = new D700

both are good body , both are not need change a few year if not very very high expection of hardware.

[snoopybee]

17-55 is DX. I think you want to say 17-35.

[kowlboy]

do you know D300 is DX formant DSLR? if do, you will understand my advice!

[HC715]

十分多謝Snoopybee同Kwolboy兩位師兄提供好寶貴的意見，都值得參考。
對我嚟講，其實D300己經好夠用。
但如果全幅機係未來大方向，咁我遲早都要行呢條路，唔想買咗D300之後冇幾耐又轉D700或將來其他型號嘅全幅機。
我大慨九年前係用F70，雖然佢只係一部好普通嘅菲林機，但總覺得拍出嚟嘅效果好過我幾年前買嘅D70，所以對全幅機有小小情意結，而揸住部D70一直唔換機都係想等Nikon嘅全幅機。
對於我嚟講，D3又貴又連直度，所以我覺得D700可以接受。
但係睇過好多前輩同師兄嘅評語，又覺得D700比起D300好唔好得幾多，以多$7000呢個增幅又好以唔係太值得。
再加上又好用又平嘅DX鏡選擇比較多，而好嘅FX鏡就貴好多(好以Nikon三寶)。
D700如果配三寶效能最好，所以我買完機後又會心思思想買埋其餘嗰二寶(已有70-200 LB5)，但買D300跟尾駛費平好多。
所以至頭痛！

[kowlboy]

HC715 hing,
I got the same question as yours, D700 or D300, but suddently D90 news had to be released, so finally I upgrade from D70 to D90, becasue I think in the future few years (or 5 years), full frame is growth period, after these years to condsier to buy full frame is much better.
in Nikkor world, DX lens can use in FX DSLR, so I would like to save money to got better lens, since i got D70 till now, I use the money to buy a few Nikkor lens (e.g. 70-200 F2.8, 105 VR F2.8...... will be 17-55 F2.8, wait it lower than 7K will got ...)and improve my skill.

[HC715]

Hi Knowlboy hing,
Thanks for your valued advice.
You are correct, upgrading to D300 or D90 will allow more resources for lenses.
I once thought of D90 as which can also take video, but later changed to D300 or D700 cause I may as well buy a Sony HD camcorder later.
One of the drawbacks of D70 is its small LCD mon being too small for one to check photo results immediately after shooting, which I can hardly tolerate.
I have not made up my mind yet.

[wolfwolf3D]

I consider D300 or D90, since I will buy 17-55F2.8, hard to decide buy which, the body is about $3000 different.

I quote the D90 set $7150 +$9500, can 24months pay, is this price ok?

Both are good and have their different selling point, still thinking.

[onlyken]

一係D90, 一係D700, 唔多使考慮D300, 因為D90在功能上唔會差過D300好多, 而D90 無論功能上或成像效果都遠比D70好N倍, 而D700係更上一層樓既產品. 所以我覺得D300係有少少高不成低不就的感覺.

[Saito]

我唔覺得D90比D300好幾多。
只係拍唔到movie，畫質上唔會有明顯的分別。
不過，單以全天候的機身，D300已經贏晒。

至於買咩機好，
不如問問樓主有幾多預算，會唔會有興趣轉FX。

[孔融]

其實買東西應該看實際需要,如因為潮流而買貴價品,我會覺得是一種浪費.當然,如果你覺得我將來一定用得到,早買早享受也不是壞事.想清楚一下自己需要到什麼程度吧

[mattwcw]

HC715師兄，我相信你是愛好攝影之人，由菲林機時代開始，你就一直影到而家。所以你先會問兩部機之間嘅選擇？
加上這兩機都係不錯嘅好機，只是全幅和數碼之間嘅分別。
你有用菲林機的經驗，當然有想買d700的念頭，我就沒有了！點解呢？
因為我只是一個數碼初哥，買了d300之後d700才發售，初時都有想我遲買一步就好了！可以選擇d700！但冷靜下來，又發覺d300的價錢和功能，我已經很滿意，知足才可以常樂。攝影都一樣，我買了d300都影了不少相，間中亦有人欣賞和讚美，但他們不會第一時間問用什麼型號的相機呢！
而且我都說本身是數碼初哥，沒有對全幅有太大的情意結。將來若果全幅的價錢好似而家的d300的話，我相信才會考慮一下了！
另外，d90和d300的雖然真係好相似，但始終d300的手感、感光和對焦系統、選單和各功能的微調設定等…都係d90俾唔到你有這麼暢快、方便和專業嘅感覺呢！

[lunar]

鏡頭錢唔好慳, 機價跌得快, 但好鏡抗跌力強.

[HC715]

好多謝 Wolfwolf3D，Onlyken，Saito，孔融，Mattwcw 同埋Lunar 幾位師兄寶貴嘅意見，使我獲益不少。

响預算方面，我唔係有錢佬，當然要精打細算！
所以我覺得D700貴過D300成7千元，係一個幾可觀嘅差距，但因為全幅機係未來大趨勢，所以如果我而家買D300，可能一年後會轉全幅機(D700或實他新型號)，但如果買D700，雖然貴啲，但可以玩耐啲先至換機(兩三年後)，所以條數拉長嚟計亦係差唔多。
同時我好懶學新嘢，所以揸住部D70一直唔換機，費事學完一部新型號冇幾耐又要再另外學更新的型號，寧願等Nikon出部可靠嘅全幅機至一次過學咗點用，之後可以又玩幾年。
所以我最關心嘅，就係究竟D700比D300優勝之處，例如 :- FX，更好嘅高ISO noise control，景深 ... 等，值唔值呢個差價？
如果值嘅，咁我會買D700，如果唔值，咁我會先買D300，等遲啲一部更好嘅FX機出咗之後再買！
我主要係影旅行相，家庭相，event相 ...等，唔會影花蟲打雀，所以D700可能比較適合啲。
不過我聽過一啲師兄講，話D700影JPG直出冇D300咁好，因為佢係高階機，係俾人主要影RAW嘅，唔知真唔真？
同時又話D300嘅手感，握手位好過D700，易於control，亦唔知係唔係？
所以，我雖然中意全幅機，但在買前一定要清楚比較兩個型號嘅分別，確定D700係值呢個7000元嘅差價至買。
抱歉麻煩咗各師兄，但在此經濟環境下，就算有預算有能力都要精打細算，確定D700嘅賣點值呢個差價！
再次多謝各位嘅良言！