[nikfans02]

Seriously considering buying a good lens for snapshot. Any Ching can advise which can give better picture quality? Thank you. (I am using D700).

[PP518]

I love 24.4

[kennykw]

24mm 1.4 G is with a better quality especially when used wide open.

35mm 1.4G is with matching quality when aperture is 1~2 f-stop smaller. And 35mm is a better focal length for snapshot as you don't need to take care of the barrel distortion as in 24mm. While 24.4G is for more serious shootings such as model portraits.

[marisalwy]

A standard or wideangle zoom is far much better for snapshots.

35 mm 1.4 and 24 mm 1.4 are too expensive and not useful for the purpose.

[nikfans02]

Thank you PP and Kenny.

Marisa,
I am also thinking about N16-35 F4. Any one knows if it is a good one, and how about compared with 24.4 and 35.4?

[marisalwy]

For your D700, both N17-35/f2.8 and N16-35/f4 are very good wideangle zooms for snapshots.

Zooms excel in convenience.

Prime lenses excel in picture quality.

So, don't compare 35/1.4 or 24/1.4 with zooms.

[tkoalbert]

我又發表一些不好聽的言論:
有幾個問題如果你明白,去買廣角鏡大光圈鏡頭,才有意義.
1) 廣角鏡大光圈下有淺景深,你知道表達那種意景是表達什麼嗎?
2) 如果你是用來snapshot "盲拍" 用自動對焦.用什麼11點51點...主體在大光圈下會中焦嗎?如果是古尺afs就沒有用1.4和2分別又有多少?(去看看景深呎)
3) 又你不是用一機,一鏡,一光圈,f1.4 你有幾多機會用?

問題問完
但我仍然提議你買afs f1.4.
1) 廣角鏡更需要大光圈
2) 35 mm f1.4 質素不及24mm f1.4 (在價位已經表現出來)
3) 人總會進步,鏡在有空閒錢買下.當要用時就得心應手.

還有
我想信在這裡明白上述原因的有不少師兄,比如ringomov, edoxli....為何你們不出聲??
原諒我多口...ringomov, edoxli兄你們較大量.所以出你們的名字.

[stephen.pit]

35/1.4
10 片 / 7 組 (1 片非球面鏡片, 帶納米結晶塗層)

24/1.4
12 片/10 組 (2 個ED 鏡片, 2片非球面鏡片、納米結晶塗層)

both lens are over 10k, by paying a bit more, 24/1.4 has better value in new and 2nd hand market.

i have both 24/1.4 and 24-70/2.8, there is no way to compare between these 2 lens, 24/1.4 gives you very high quality of pics.
just need to be very careful when you use f1.4, focusing is not as easy as 2.8.
it is not an good idea to take snap shot with f1.4
if you want to take snap shots mainly, normal 24/2.8 already do the job and there is no need to go for the top range of the lens.

but on the other hand, my theory is always go for the top, you won't lose money by selling it in the future where entry level lens is very hard to sell or it becomes really cheap.

[terencehonin]

依家情況, 按貨源供應比較實際. 除左支 24.4, 想搵 35.4 真係非常困難

回應一下樓上位師兄, 什麼淺景深, 大光圈中唔中焦及一機一鏡, 回想起初玩單反真係一 d 都唔明, 只係睇左個種大光圈立體感, 已經愛上了

"人總會進步" 吧 !

[edoxli]

Tkoalbert 兄
我是一個不重視器材的人,有多餘錢買什麼都不是問題.所以我不會在器材上比意見,而且你說24好,有35的人又說那又說這.真是沒有意義.
35/24 f1.4 我一定不買
1) 廣角鏡大光圈下有淺景深,你知道表達那種意景是表達什麼嗎?

這個真是很多人都不明白,但一個普通fee prgramme已經可以做到,我明白影出來的,一定好於ps出來,為了一個功能....要比多很多錢.

2) 如果你是用來snapshot "盲拍" 用自動對焦.用什麼11點51點...主體在大光圈下會中焦嗎?如果是古尺afs就沒有用1.4和2分別又有多少?(去看看景深呎)

正如你所說,afs對我真是不重要,尤甚在wide

3) 又你不是用一機,一鏡,一光圈,f1.4 你有幾多機會用?

我比較"濫" 什麼都喜歡用,菲林,lomo,即影即有,.....沒有那麼專心去用一機一鏡
而且一機,一鏡,一光圈好似是leica 好友用他們的50mm f1傳出來.用24mm做一機,一鏡,一光圈不容易,真是高手高手高高手.

[PP518]

以我所知,ringomov & edoxli Ching兩個都不會在乎於器材方便, 由其是ringomov Ching, 佢差唔多所有鏡頭都是副鏡, 但佢影出嚟既相大家有目共睹, 所以ringomov Ching佢係一個好好既磅樣話俾我地知用靚器材未必出倒靚相, 用副廠鏡都可以做大師. 以上只是小弟一些見解, 如有得罪請多見諒

[煩友]

有錢就買24/1.4, 冇錢諗乜都冇用.

[Tigerowl]

有錢就買24/1.4, 冇錢諗乜都冇用.

x 2

[marisalwy]

又你不是用一機,一鏡,一光圈,f1.4 你有幾多機會用?

Fully agree

[煩友]

有可以唔用, 冇就諗都唔洗諗
香港地最快可以開幾多米? 一樣通街發拉利保林寶堅尼.
唔通買o既都係傻佬?傻佬又買得起靚車?