[winnwong]

如題....唔通佢地FEEL到NIKON 要出D800....

[kingkonghk]

2手價幾錢?

可能趁呢排炒價, 咪賣囉

[ringomov]

Nikon 出機係唔聲咁出，其實你見到 D3100出以預視到新一批機會出取代舊型號，Nikon 再唔出新機將會比 Canon越拋越遠.....

試想想 D700 仲係 1200萬像素賣萬七今時今日吸引嗎？

上 FF 機起碼都要2千萬以上先會慮....

[kingkonghk]

其實1200萬像素已經ok

不過對手多1倍, 又係咁上下錢, 難搞d

[wklouis]

不過除了像素, 都有好多野要睇既.
有人希望高ISO表現好, D700交足功課.
相比對手都係5D MKII, 大家都唔係D咩新野,
個人感覺多數NIKON 都係等CANON發表完新機才見有新野出.
當然, 而家科技野, 已經唔係相片先決, 睇一部機, 只係睇像素,
感光度.....

[winnwong]

上 FF 機起碼都要2千萬以上先會慮.... ==============

好認同, 冇咗1.5x, 要crop嘢都係高pixel好,

見到d5100出咗, 為nikon高興, 希望佢地加油

[marisalwy]

We show no interest in high pixel.

In fact, high ISO performance is far more practical and useful than high pixel.

You see - D3s is more useful and popular than D3X

[ssannwong]

>>上 FF 機起碼都要2千萬以上先會慮....

質素好16M都OK, 現代玩攝影始終好有機會用PS chop圖, pixel向上發展始終係有市場

我個人比較顧慮價格, 20M以上盛惠兩萬五既話, 我係唔會捨得買~

>>high ISO performance is far more practical and useful than high pixel.

呢個睇法比較因應大眾用135 FF DSLR相機既需要, 好多人都係貪方便唔閃唔腳直打直出, 唔需要大pixel而需要高ISO表現; 但係例如Digital back之類既商業用器材仍然係繼續挑戰pixel極限, 仲有係中片幅機及Digital back最大ISO遠遠低於D3(莫說D7000同D3s), 證明不顧高ISO表現, 以高pixel單單追求細緻畫質既demand仍然相當大~

[ssannwong]

>>點解而家咁多二手D700出呢?

近來一手加哂價ma, 趁高價放二手拎多個錢都好 ^^

[ringomov]

你放心價錢只會一路向下移.....
等canon 700 D或8D出2000萬像，Nikon 機ㄧ定死跟.

10年前D1X得600萬像賣3萬3千幾，E家D3s都係得1200萬像賣一樣價，
D3出到現在都有五年D3X係怪胎同脫離左消費者市場，D300都接近3年.
懂得 nikon既慣性週期買機就知時侯了.

[水上小白龍]

D700同D3係同一塊CMOS
d3s= 黑夜之神
d3x=像素之神
針沒兩頭利, 邊有甘好又iso高又像數高

Digital back之類既商業用器材仍然係繼續挑戰pixel極限, 影呢類商業用途既相通常都系光線充足環境下進行拍攝, 所以iso唔雖要甘高, 好似我甘, 用D700最緊要iso做得好, 平時用方便

[lake]

Digital back are always used in studio just as D3x do. As light has already been adjudged to fit for shooting, high iso is not necessary.

[kingkonghk]

機背可以長曝1小時都好滑, 冇得同機背比

[水上小白龍]

機背已經系神台級

[pierokwong]

Interesting discussion in here.

From my use and need, I don't crop much and I compose the image at the time when I shoot it. that's why I feel like D3s & D700 really fulfil my working needs. In terms of wedding photography.

My business partner just change from full Canon line up to Nikon. Yes, I have successfully converted him =p

His feeling after a few Nikon wedding is, he just need one memory card now, and instead he need a few from Canon.

Any real advantage on bigger pixel? Not for us, or for people who are from old age photography =p I mean for those who frame and shot and don't crop much.


Once again, it is commonly know if you want high ISO, you need to let go MP. and D3s and D700 are both enjoying the benefit of high ISO on every photos.


For extreme high MP, people can go for medium format, it even comes with better dynamic range as well. But does it mean medium format is the king? No ....

That's another trade off. For anyone used medium format, you will understand how slow it react. Also not to mention the ISO performance compare to D3s & D700.


That's why it's always good for people to fully understand the own need, and then go for the camera that is best fit to the need. Everyone is different.

Is there only one "best" camera on earth to suit everyone? Of course no, there is just good cameras that fit the need of the photographer.

Cheers,
Piero