[alexchwoo]

Dear all big brothers,

Which one is better for taking flowers and insects?

Which one is better for taking protrait?

Thanks a lot.

alexchwoo

[真丹尼爾]

Which one is better for taking flowers and insects?

Flowers >>>>> 60mm
Insect >>>>>>>105mm

protrait >>>>> both is O.K.

[alexchwoo]

thx 真丹尼爾

[alexchwoo]

真丹尼爾,
is there any reason behind?

Thx, thx!

[Philippe]

影蟲105mm其實唔多夠長,尤其會飛走果D,最好買180mm或者200mm

[alexchwoo]

180 or 200mm?

does nikon have that?

[B and H]

180 or 200mm?

does nikon have that?

------------------------------

400mm 都仲有, 不過$$$$

[Philippe]

400mm既微距鏡應該冇.
不過Nikon有支200mm f4 micro,約$8800
Sigma有支150mm f2.8 macro約$4700
Tamron有支180mm f3.5 macro約$5250.

[B and H]

佢好似無話一定要微距, 是我誤解???

[alexchwoo]

sorry!
i did not make myself clear.
I just want Nikon micro lens!
200mm micro seems very powerful but the aperature is too small, right?

Thanks Philippe for the information!

[Philippe]

如果真係影微距的話,幾乎冇可能用到f4咁大光圈,在大放大率時,f16都幾起碼.就算比較遠的都頂盡用到f8.再遠其實都唔駛用微距鏡喇.
不過如果支鏡要影下其他嘢,咁F4就或者叫做細,但都同Canon果支小小白一樣.
俾個網頁你了解下.
http://www.beautifulbugs.com/beautifulbugs/howto.htm

[alexchwoo]

will read.
thx a lot!!!!

[B and H]

c-hing, 影昆蟲都唔一定要micro既, see below:

http://www.dcfever.com/photosharing/view.php?id=633908 今日之選

[tzemang]

我用105影蝶大半年，起初都有懷疑105唔夠用，想用180/200，但係畀師兄們指是我未夠功力，未發揮105真正威力。於是苦心努力，發覺影蟲/影蝶的的要好畀心機，沒有耐心，沒有毅力，沒有愛護大自然之心，根本抵受不了拍昆蟲/生態的辛苦。
經過三個月練習，才開始發覺原來105也可以拍到很多以為拍不到的昆蟲，如飛快的青鳳蝶、燕鳳蝶、長喙天蛾等。
拍生態，耐性>技術>裝備。

未有單反時，我用大砲dc，甚至普通dc都拍過微距，也一樣可以拍到好的照片，我見過同行友人，她就用一部舊DC KODAK V507，拍出了很多我看不見的精彩微距昆蟲。而且她只是個12歲的小女生。
(她的裝備或技術固然不能算好，但卻勝在有一顆耐心或愛心，加上敏銳的觀察，才能拍出好照片)

誠然，單鏡加上105VR MICRO，使我更享受微距生態之樂。因為好的器材，確使拍攝微距生態的成功率大大增加。

師兄，有興趣可以YAHOO BLOG，找臥熊先生的網誌，當中對微距生態的器材，有很詳盡的分析。

[alexchwoo]

Thanks a lot, tzemang.
Any tips you can give me?
Did you try 60mm micro?
Cheers!