| 上個主題 :: 下個主題 |
| 作者 |
訊息 |
6638
註冊: 2002-11-29
上載我的肖像
|
 唔該邊隻A3 size printer印相比較靚？ Post time: 8 月 31 日 |
|
|
|
唔會經常用，比d意建唔該…
|
|
|
|
 |
billylui
註冊: 2002-10-18
上載我的肖像
|
| Re: 唔該邊隻A3 size printer印相比較靚？ Post time: 9 月 1 日 |
|
|
um.....................
Canon I9100 or EPSON 1290
|
|
|
|
|
X100
註冊: 2003-10-02
上載我的肖像
|
| Re: 唔該邊隻A3 size printer印相比較靚？ Post time: 12 月 13 日 |
|
|
|
不用說Epson2100 is the best(I deeply impress by its quality), 特別是你喜歡玩B/W
|
|
|
|
|
ykterry
註冊: 2003-10-10
上載我的肖像
|
| Re: 唔該邊隻A3 size printer印相比較靚？ Post time: 3 月 1 日 |
|
|
|
買epson的墨水買窮人,何來樂趣,的人不會對打印軟體作精確調較,現今科技各牌子表現也頂尖,看消耗品為重點
|
|
|
|
|
Martin@SEPHIROT
註冊: 2004-03-03
上載我的肖像
|
| Re: 唔該邊隻A3 size printer印相比較靚？ Post time: 3 月 3 日 |
|
|
Inkjet printer is expensive for ink. The output is not a real photo. Quality is just ok. So why use it?
Better try digital output. Real photo paper for real photo. I own a Fuji Pictrography PG4000 for this purpose.
Quality? All I can say it outputs 100% size file, 400dpi(ie file size should be 42 x 29.7cm, 400 dpi for A3).
Cost? Should be the same as using inkjet or take it to the lab output. However, quality must be better.
|
|
|
|
|
dmcwoo
註冊: 2002-12-30
上載我的肖像
|
| Re: 唔該邊隻A3 size printer印相比較靚？ Post time: 3 月 5 日 |
|
|
|
If you are using digital camera, you will get better photo by inkjet printer. I am using Canon i850 and I got better quality. The quality is depend on the photo paper you use. of course, it is more expensive than the photo lab. For A3, Epson 2100 is the best. It cost about $5100
|
|
|
|
|
| |
