7 月 16 日 (星期三) | 會員登記|會員中心
攝影技巧
Post new topic   Reply to topic  到最上層  |  回到主題  |  搜尋 
頁數: 1共 3 回應
上個主題 :: 下個主題  
作者 訊息

ricric_lo




註冊: 2007-07-07

上載我的肖像
題目Aperture Vs. Lightroom Vs. Bridge     Post time: 4 月 23 日

大家覺得邊個最好用?
Back to top

ACanonGuy




註冊: 2009-12-21

上載我的肖像
題目Re: Aperture Vs. Lightroom Vs. Bridge     Post time: 4 月 23 日

Adobe Bridge is a very different product comparing with Aperture or Lightroom. Bridge is more a media manager that you can use it to organize, browse and locate your pictures and other media files. Aperture and Lightroom supports full photo management workflow. I have used both. They are very similar product and both very nice.

If you are a Mac user and you don't think you will move to Windows, there is a good reason to use Aperture since it integrates so well with other Apple applications. Aperture is for Mac and Mac only as you may know.

I am a Lightroom user and very happy with it. Please note Lightroom 3.0 has been in beta for a while and should be available soon.
觀看用戶檔案 回覆 Back to top

lokism3




註冊: 2008-12-13

上載我的肖像
題目Re: Aperture Vs. Lightroom Vs. Bridge     Post time: 4 月 23 日

I use Bridge mainly.

I don't need the "Work flow managament" from Aperture or Lightroom, and I have had my own work flow practices. For normal cases, Bridge output the images directly to Photoshop; just like what an old fashion photographer did, take pictures than go to develop film (Bridge) & print picture (Photoshop). It is a "2-steps" D & P process. Use the designed "Work flow" or not is up to your choice. I use Lightroom on my netbook too as quick inspection of RAW files on location works too.
觀看用戶檔案 回覆 Back to top

ricric_lo




註冊: 2007-07-07

上載我的肖像
題目Re: Aperture Vs. Lightroom Vs. Bridge     Post time: 4 月 24 日

Thank you for all CHings kind advice.
觀看用戶檔案 回覆 Back to top
 
頁數: 1共 3 回應
Post new topic   Reply to topic  到最上層  |  回到主題  |  搜尋 



 討論區列表  |  Need a Login? Register Here 
 User Login
 User Name:
 Password: