Thank you tam_dominci.

I agree that the " bottom water" may have a little bit brighter than it should be. Anyway, your comments is constructive and positive. Thanks again.

As a rule in composition especially in Chinese style scenic painting 1/2 to 2/3 of empty space is not too much.



IMHO the water at the bottom is too bright and distract from the subject.



So I prefer to remove bottom water not because too much empty space but too bright and distracting.



Just my personal feeling.



Happy shooting !



Vote.

sorry, 應該是 Soupyman, 打錯了

答 Souperman : 這張相我自己覺得最大的缺點是不夠 sharp, 主要因為經 scanner 入電腦, 而且水面有些反光, 令顏色亦覺沉悶, 經PS 調整後比較綠些, 但犧牲的是連隻白鷺亦帶些綠色 (其實周圍環境綠色也有關係), 變成可能如您所說的 “藍鳥”。本來我可令隻鷺鷥”白”些, 但效果比「藍鳥」更差, 變成「紙板鳥」。至於構圖方面, 我覺得”水位過多”並無不妥, 第一因為水位下方藍綠色較淺, 與上方的濃綠可產生調和作用, 第二,因為下方水位有漣漪, 如若cut 去, 連同第一因素便會令整張相片覺得較呆板。相片顯示”對焦不準”, 但「綠」加「鳥」看來仍覺和諧。以上是大家交換心得意見, 切磋之餘, 再次多謝各位的評論。

I think this composition is good....

藍鳥

多謝 tyl 欣賞及 www01 指教, 有機會請參閱我其它的相片, 您會發覺很多內容我特別喜歡留下大量篇幅甚至空白.

水佔位太多, 構圖方面尚待改善 (小女子愚見)

影得好靚,投! ^^